Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 05:26 UTC

Bukk94 / KickLib

C# library for accessing API from Kick.com livestreaming platform.

C#MIT★ 38 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗

Bukk94/KickLib holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MartinPersonal account
11 followers10 public repossince Feb 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetKickLib1.13.1-5246 days agoapikicksdkchatclientcsharpdatalivestream

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 17 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume45 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push17
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases12 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 17 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~34 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv1.13.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases34

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.4/60Stars38 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars38
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.2/80Total downloads34,959 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesKickLib
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads34,959
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 94% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.942
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance12/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs12
open_issues0
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of Bukk94
19.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginBukk94
public_repos10
account_age_days4,970
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 46 days ago
20/20Version history52 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesKickLib
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish46

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

43Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
2.2/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages22
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 22 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
8.5/40Legible commit history16 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.16
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapKickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj, KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj, KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsKickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj, KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj, KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj, KickLib/KickLib.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/344 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes20,188
source_files_sampled344
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

38GitHub stars
8contributors
45commits, last 12 months
17days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151312023-092025-012026-04
Major 0Minor 4Patch 4

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 05:26 UTC

3Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 38
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp[2.0.0]KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerSharp[14.0.0]KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetRestSharp114.0.0KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp3.1.1KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerSharp[21.1.1]KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetJsonSubTypes2.0.1KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetOtp.NET1.4.1KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetPolly8.7.0KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Security4.3.2KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetWebSocketSharper1.0.42KickLib.Api.Unofficial/KickLib.Api.Unofficial.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.9KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj
NuGetPusherClient2.2.1KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Security4.3.2KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1KickLib.Client/KickLib.Client.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions[7.2.2]KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5KickLib.Tests/KickLib.Tests.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp[2.0.0]KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerSharp[14.0.0]KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetRestSharp114.0.0KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp3.1.1KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerSharp[21.1.1]KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetFluentResults4.0.0KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http10.0.9KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http.Polly10.0.9KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.9KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetJsonSubTypes2.0.1KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Security4.3.2KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetWebSocketSharper1.0.42KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetPusherClient2.2.1KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetOtp.NET1.4.1KickLib/KickLib.csproj
NuGetPolly8.7.0KickLib/KickLib.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetFluentAssertions7.2.2direct
NuGetFluentResults4.0.0direct
NuGetJsonSubTypes2.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http.Polly10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetOtp.NET1.4.1direct
NuGetPolly8.7.0direct
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp2.0.0direct
NuGetPuppeteerExtraSharp3.1.1direct
NuGetPuppeteerSharp14.0.0direct
NuGetPuppeteerSharp21.1.1direct
NuGetPusherClient2.2.1direct
NuGetRestSharp114.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Security4.3.2direct
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1direct
NuGetWebSocketSharper1.0.42direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 22 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.