Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-10 20:50 UTC

CCBlueX / LiquidBounce

A free Minecraft hacked client (utility mod) for Fabric

KotlinGPL-3.0★ 2,310 stars⑂ 683 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗

#liquidbounce #minecraft #hacked-client #fabricmc #fabric #minecraft-mod #utility-mod

CCBlueX/LiquidBounce holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (62/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CCBlueXOrganization

302 followers42 public repossince May 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36	Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,217 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,217
human_commit_share	0.92
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	52

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 96 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 25 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~35.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	96
latest_release_tag	v0.39.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	25
mean_days_between_releases	35.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

87Excellent

How it's scored

54.6/60	Stars — 2,310 stars
23.6/25	Forks — 683 forks
8.9/15	Watchers — 41 watchers

Inputs used

forks	683
stars	2,310
watchers	41
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	97
top_contributor_share	0.477

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

39.9/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
25.8/30	PR acceptance — 4,707/5,477 decided PRs merged
4.3/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	4,707
open_issues	145
closed_issues	2,784
prs_merged_7d	12
prs_decided_7d	17
prs_merged_30d	28
prs_decided_30d	39
issue_closed_ratio	0.95
closed_unmerged_prs	770
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	6

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
17.8/25	Owner reach — 302 followers of CCBlueX
23.9/25	Track record — 42 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	302
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	CCBlueX
public_repos	42
account_age_days	4,108

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://liquidbounce.net/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	liquidbounce, minecraft, hacked-client, fabricmc, fabric, minecraft-mod, utility-mod
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://liquidbounce.net/
docs_site	https://liquidbounce.net/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	5.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	10
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	130
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 130 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 91 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.989
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — build.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — src-theme/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	src-theme/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	build.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.05

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/1,606 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Kotlin
largest_source_bytes	37,958
source_files_sampled	1,606
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

2,310GitHub stars

97contributors

1,217commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

96releases

2bus factor

145open issues

Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 683 ⇿

0Stars

683Forks

96Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 39Patch 23

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10

5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-10 20:50 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 8

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@jhubbardsf/svelte-sortablejs	`^1.1.0`	src-theme/package.json
npm	@simonwep/pickr	`^1.9.0`	src-theme/package.json
npm	chart.js	`^4.5.0`	src-theme/package.json
npm	chartjs-plugin-dragdata	`^2.3.1`	src-theme/package.json
npm	country-code-lookup	`^0.1.2`	src-theme/package.json
npm	dateformat	`^5.0.3`	src-theme/package.json
npm	nouislider	`^15.7.1`	src-theme/package.json
npm	svelte-spa-router	`^4.0.1`	src-theme/package.json

All dependencies 130

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 122 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@jhubbardsf/svelte-sortablejs	`1.1.0`	direct
npm	@simonwep/pickr	`1.9.1`	direct
npm	chart.js	`4.5.0`	direct
npm	chartjs-plugin-dragdata	`2.3.1`	direct
npm	country-code-lookup	`0.1.3`	direct
npm	dateformat	`5.0.3`	direct
npm	nouislider	`15.8.1`	direct
npm	svelte-spa-router	`4.0.1`	direct
npm	@ampproject/remapping	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.25`	indirect
npm	@kurkle/color	`0.3.4`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-android-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-ia32	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	@sveltejs/acorn-typescript	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	@sveltejs/load-config	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte-inspector	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/svelte	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/dateformat	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	aria-query	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	axobject-query	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	clsx	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	core-js	`3.37.0`	indirect
npm	d3-dispatch	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	d3-drag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	d3-selection	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.25.1`	indirect
npm	esm-env	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	esrap	`1.4.9`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.4.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.4.4`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	immutable	`5.1.9`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-reference	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	kleur	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	locate-character	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nanopop	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	node-addon-api	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.23`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	regexparam	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.37.0`	indirect
npm	sade	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.100.0`	indirect
npm	sortablejs	`1.15.6`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	svelte	`5.33.9`	indirect
npm	svelte-check	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.6.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`6.4.2`	indirect
npm	vitefu	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	zimmerframe	`1.1.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 130 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`4.37.0`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
vite	`6.4.2`	indirect	high	2	`8.0.16`
svelte	`5.33.9`	indirect	moderate	6	`5.55.7`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records