Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-10 07:32 UTC

CanopyTax / canopy-webpack-config

Some defaults for webpack configs at canopy

JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Aug 2018View on GitHub ↗

CanopyTax/canopy-webpack-config holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (23/100). It was last updated 37 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CanopyOrganization · verified domain
18 followers102 public repossince Sep 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmcanopy-webpack-config4.5.02,5223837 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 37 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push37
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 18 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 351 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~243.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tagv4.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release351
mean_days_between_releases243.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars2
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.4/80Monthly downloads — 2,522 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescanopy-webpack-config
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,522
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.397
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance — 41/43 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs41
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
9.2/25Owner reach — 18 followers of CanopyTax
25/25Track record — 102 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginCanopyTax
public_repos102
account_age_days4,396

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history — 38 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescanopy-webpack-config
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

36Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfront-end
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages155
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:canopy-webpack-config@4.5.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 155 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

23At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.3/40Legible commit history — 30 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.306
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
41.2/55Manageable file sizes — 1/4 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes3,005,868
source_files_sampled4
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

2GitHub stars
9contributors
32commits, last 12 months
37days since last push
18releases
2bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512018-102021-052023-12
Major 3Minor 6Patch 3

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-10 07:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@tailwindcss/postcss4.3.3package.json
npmclean-webpack-plugin^4.0.0package.json
npmcss-loader^7.1.2package.json
npmpostcss^8.4.49package.json
npmpostcss-loader^8.1.1package.json
npmstyle-loader^4.0.0package.json
npmtailwindcss4.3.3package.json
npmurl^0.11.0package.json
npmwebpack-bundle-analyzer^4.7.0package.json
npmwebpack-merge^4.2.1package.json
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 140 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tailwindcss/postcss4.3.3direct
npmclean-webpack-plugin4.0.0direct
npmcss-loader7.1.4direct
npmpostcss8.5.26direct
npmpostcss-loader8.2.1direct
npmstyle-loader4.0.0direct
npmtailwindcss4.3.3direct
npmurl0.11.4direct
npmwebpack-bundle-analyzer4.10.2direct
npmwebpack-merge4.2.2direct
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@discoveryjs/json-ext0.5.7indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.3indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/events3.0.0indirect
npm@types/glob7.1.1indirect
npm@types/minimatch3.0.3indirect
npm@types/node12.0.4indirect
npmacorn8.7.1indirect
npmacorn-walk8.2.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union1.0.2indirect
npmarray-uniq1.0.3indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcommander7.2.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.2indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdebounce1.2.1indirect
npmdel4.1.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmduplexer0.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.5indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.4indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob7.1.4indirect
npmglobby6.1.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmgzip-size6.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmicss-utils5.1.0indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-path-cwd2.1.0indirect
npmis-path-in-cwd2.1.0indirect
npmis-path-inside2.1.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmopener1.5.2indirect
npmp-map2.1.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-is-inside1.0.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpify4.0.1indirect
npmpinkie2.0.4indirect
npmpinkie-promise2.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-modules-extract-imports3.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-modules-local-by-default4.2.0indirect
npmpostcss-modules-scope3.2.1indirect
npmpostcss-modules-values4.0.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser7.1.5indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprettier3.6.2indirect
npmpunycode1.4.1indirect
npmqs6.14.0indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmrimraf2.6.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.0indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsirv2.0.4indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmws7.5.8indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:canopy-webpack-config@4.5.0 pulls in 155 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.