Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-16 01:55 UTC

CleverTap / clevertap-expo-plugin

CleverTap Expo Config Plugin

TypeScript · JavaScriptCustom license★ 4 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationWeb interfacehow this is determined

CleverTap/clevertap-expo-plugin holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 38 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CleverTapOrganization · verified domain
62 followers92 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@clevertap/clevertap-expo-plugin1.1.022,207638 days agoexpoclevertappushnotifications

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 38 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume — 54 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year54
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push38
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 38 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~108.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tag1.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release38
mean_days_between_releases108.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars4
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
58/80Monthly downloads — 22,207 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@clevertap/clevertap-expo-plugin
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads22,207
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.551

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
28.4/30PR acceptance — 35/37 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues2
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

88Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
12.9/25Owner reach — 62 followers of CleverTap
25/25Track record — 92 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers62
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginCleverTap
public_repos92
account_age_days4,451

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 38 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@clevertap/clevertap-expo-plugin
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish38

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

34At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.5/40Legible commit history — 64 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.646
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

45Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — android/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
11/11Static type checking — CTExample/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsCTExample/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestsandroid/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/44 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes33,468
source_files_sampled44
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
2contributors
54commits, last 12 months
38days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312025-082026-012026-07
Major 1Minor 0Patch 2
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-16 01:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@clevertap/clevertap-expo-pluginfile:.yalc/@clevertap/clevertap-expo-pluginCTExample/package.json
npm@expo/vector-icons^15.0.2CTExample/package.json
npm@react-navigation/native^7.0.14CTExample/package.json
npm@react-navigation/native-stack^7.2.0CTExample/package.json
npmclevertap-react-native^4.3.1CTExample/package.json
npmexpo57.0.18CTExample/package.json
npmexpo-asset57.0.15CTExample/package.json
npmexpo-build-properties57.0.15CTExample/package.json
npmexpo-linking57.0.8CTExample/package.json
npmexpo-router57.0.17CTExample/package.json
npmreact19.2.3CTExample/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.3CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native0.86.3CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-safe-area-context~5.6.2CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-screens~4.23.0CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-svg-transformer^1.5.0CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-toast-message^2.2.1CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-user-defaults^0.1.5CTExample/package.json
npmreact-native-video^6.17.0CTExample/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with CleverTap/clevertap-expo-plugin. Read them side by side →

84OneSignal/onesignal-expo-pluginOneSignal makes engaging customers simple and is the fastest, most reliable service to send push notifications, in-app messages, SMS, and emails. This plugin makes it easy to integrate your Expo app with OneSignal. https://onesignal.comExcellent95OneSignal/react-native-onesignalOneSignal makes engaging customers simple and is the fastest, most reliable service to send push notifications, in-app messages, SMS, and emails. This plugin makes it easy to integrate your React Native app with OneSignal. https://onesignal.comExceptional89Atmosphere/atmospherePortable AI agent runtime for the JVM. One @Agent class runs on Spring AI, LangChain4j, Anthropic, or 9 more behind one SPI. Token streaming, tool calls, human approvals, and governance over WebSocket, SSE, gRPC, or WebTransport/HTTP3. Speaks MCP, A2A, and AG-UI.Excellent91marcocrupi/react-native-notify-kitMaintained Notifee-compatible fork: a feature-rich React Native notification library for Android, iOS, FCM Mode, and Expo CNG development builds.Excellent83OneSignal/onesignal-node-apiOneSignal Node ClientExcellent81FlourishHealth/terrenoExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.