Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 02:15 UTC

CoPokBl / MinecraftDotnet

Minecraft protocol implementation in C#

C#MIT★ 11 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗

#dotnet #library #minecraft #minecraft-server #minecraft-dotnet #csharp #minecraft-csharp

CoPokBl/MinecraftDotnet holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (49/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated 80 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CoPokBlPersonal account

13 followers81 public repossince Jan 2020Locatrix

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
NuGet	MinecraftDotnet.Protocol	0.0.1	-	1	393 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

61Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 80 days ago
15.2/36	Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 118 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	118
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	80
active_weeks_last_year	22

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

21At Risk

How it's scored

16.2/60	Stars — 11 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	11
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate

How it's scored

46/80	Total downloads — 26,484 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	MinecraftDotnet.Protocol
dependents	—
ecosystems	nuget
total_downloads	26,484
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.885

Issue & PR responsiveness

57Moderate

How it's scored

25.6/42	Issue resolution — 61% of issues closed
22.5/30	PR acceptance — 15/20 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	15
open_issues	9
closed_issues	14
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.609
closed_unmerged_prs	5
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.2/25	Owner reach — 13 followers of CoPokBl
25/25	Track record — 81 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	13
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	CoPokBl
public_repos	81
account_age_days	2,414

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

63Moderate

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 393 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	MinecraftDotnet.Protocol
ecosystems	nuget
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	393

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	dotnet, library, minecraft, minecraft-server, minecraft-dotnet, csharp, minecraft-csharp
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

9Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
8.8/40	Legible commit history — 16 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.165
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

26At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — ClientLib/ClientLib.csproj, CodeGen/CodeGen.csproj, ManagedServer.Benchmarking/ManagedServer.Benchmarking.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	ClientLib/ClientLib.csproj, CodeGen/CodeGen.csproj, ManagedServer.Benchmarking/ManagedServer.Benchmarking.csproj, ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj, ManagedServer/ManagedServer.csproj, Minecraft.Benchmarking/Minecraft.Benchmarking.csproj, Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj, Minecraft/Minecraft.csproj, PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj, PolarWorlds/PolarWorlds.csproj, Proxy/Proxy.csproj, TestClient/TestClient.csproj, TestServer/TestServer.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
53.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 36/1,492 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	828,331
source_files_sampled	1,492
oversized_source_files	36

Key facts

11GitHub stars

6contributors

118commits, last 12 months

80days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

9open issues

NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch nuget package 'MinecraftDotnet.Polar' from its registry
Could not fetch nuget package 'MinecraftDotnet.ManagedServer' from its registry
GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿

0Stars

5Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 02:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	12 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 26

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4-beta1`	CodeGen/CodeGen.csproj
NuGet	BenchmarkDotNet	`0.15.8`	ManagedServer.Benchmarking/ManagedServer.Benchmarking.csproj
NuGet	coverlet.collector	`6.0.4`	ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`17.14.0`	ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit	`4.3.2`	ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit.Analyzers	`4.7.0`	ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit3TestAdapter	`5.0.0`	ManagedServer.Testing/ManagedServer.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub	`8.0.0`	ManagedServer/ManagedServer.csproj
NuGet	BenchmarkDotNet	`0.15.8`	Minecraft.Benchmarking/Minecraft.Benchmarking.csproj
NuGet	coverlet.collector	`6.0.4`	Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`17.14.0`	Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit	`4.3.2`	Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit.Analyzers	`4.7.0`	Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit3TestAdapter	`5.0.0`	Minecraft.Testing/Minecraft.Testing.csproj
NuGet	BouncyCastle.Cryptography	`2.7.0-beta.98`	Minecraft/Minecraft.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub	`8.0.0`	Minecraft/Minecraft.csproj
NuGet	MinecraftDotnet.NBT	`1.0.3-dev.9`	Minecraft/Minecraft.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4-beta1`	Minecraft/Minecraft.csproj
NuGet	coverlet.collector	`6.0.4`	PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`17.14.0`	PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit	`4.3.2`	PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit.Analyzers	`4.7.0`	PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj
NuGet	NUnit3TestAdapter	`5.0.0`	PolarWorlds.Testing/PolarWorlds.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub	`8.0.0`	PolarWorlds/PolarWorlds.csproj
NuGet	ZstdSharp.Port	`0.8.6`	PolarWorlds/PolarWorlds.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4-beta1`	TestClient/TestClient.csproj

All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records