Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:48 UTC

CommunityToolkit / Maui

The .NET MAUI Community Toolkit is a community-created library that contains .NET MAUI Extensions, Advanced UI/UX Controls, and Behaviors to help make your life as a .NET MAUI developer easier

C#MIT★ 2,684 stars⑂ 496 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗
#dotnet#dotnet-maui#maui#ios#android#macos#maccatalyst#windows#winui#mobile#desktop#hacktoberfest

CommunityToolkit/Maui holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Community ToolkitOrganization
1,589 followers30 public repossince Jul 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 199 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year199
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag14.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases15.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

88Excellent
How it's scored
55.6/60Stars — 2,684 stars
22.5/25Forks — 496 forks
10/15Watchers — 65 watchers
Inputs used
forks496
stars2,684
watchers65
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.279

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
36.6/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 950/1,123 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs950
open_issues163
closed_issues1,103
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.871
closed_unmerged_prs173
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

95Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
23/25Owner reach — 1,589 followers of CommunityToolkit
22.9/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,589
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginCommunityToolkit
public_repos30
account_age_days2,923
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/communitytoolkit/maui
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdotnet, dotnet-maui, maui, ios, android, macos, maccatalyst, windows, winui, mobile, desktop, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/communitytoolkit/maui
docs_sitehttps://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/communitytoolkit/maui
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/async.instructions.md, .github/instructions/codestyle.instructions.md, .github/instructions/mobile-memory-leaks.instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/async.instructions.md, .github/instructions/codestyle.instructions.md, .github/instructions/mobile-memory-leaks.instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,108
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 2/947 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes99,551
source_files_sampled947
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,684GitHub stars
100contributors
199commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
163open issues
—package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 6/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 49

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows0.15.7indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows0.15.8indirect
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Maui.Markup7.0.1indirect
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm8.4.2indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions8.8.0indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions.Analyzers0.34.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing1.1.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing1.1.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testing1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testing1.1.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http.Resilience10.5.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls.Maps—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Essentials—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics.Skia—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.8.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WindowsAppSDK2.2.0indirect
NuGetNito.AsyncEx5.1.2indirect
NuGetPolySharp1.16.0indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.Views.Maui.Controls—indirect
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn110.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn110.0.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn110.0.9indirect
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Speech10.0.1indirect
NuGetTizen.UIExtensions.NUI—indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Activity.Ktx1.10.1.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Camera.Camera21.4.2.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Camera.Extensions1.4.2.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Camera.View1.4.2.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.Common1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.Dash1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.Hls1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.ExoPlayer.Rtsp1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.Session1.8.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.AndroidX.Media3.UI1.8.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v23.2.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v23.2.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with CommunityToolkit/Maui. Read them side by side →

98dotnet/maui.NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.Exceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional98appium/appiumCross-platform automation framework for all kinds of apps, built on top of the W3C WebDriver protocolExceptional98microsoft/react-native-test-appreact-native-test-app provides an app for all supported platforms as a packageExceptional99PowerShell/PowerShellPowerShell for every system!Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.