Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 00:54 UTC

CrispStrobe / CrispASR

C++ ggml runtime hub for multilingual ASR and TTS models: Cohere Transcribe, Parakeet TDT, Voxtral, Canary 1B v2, etc, plus universal forced alignment, and more

C++ · Python · CMIT★ 612 stars⑂ 104 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#cohere-transcribe#cohere-transcribe-03-2026#ggml#speech-recognition#speech-to-text#stt#transcription#whisper-cpp#parakeet#voxtral

CrispStrobe/CrispASR holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CrispStrobePersonal account
50 followers168 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocrispasr0.8.3286104 days agospeech-recognitionasrwhisperspeech-to-textggmlapi-bindings
PyPIcrispasr0.8.321,906104 days agoasrspeech-recognitionwhisperggmlspeech-to-texttranscription
crates.iocrispasr-sys0.8.32103104 days agospeech-recognitionffiasrwhisperggmlexternal-ffi-bindings

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 6,481 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year6,481
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 83 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count83
latest_release_tagv0.8.32
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases4.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

67Good
How it's scored
45.2/60Stars — 612 stars
16.8/25Forks — 104 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks104
stars612
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,095 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescrispasr, crispasr, crispasr-sys
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads566
monthly_downloads2,095
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.964

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
41.3/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
19.8/30PR acceptance — 74/112 decided PRs merged
9.6/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 17/23 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs74
open_issues5
closed_issues311
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d30
prs_decided_30d38
issue_closed_ratio0.984
closed_unmerged_prs38
first_time_authors_30d7
first_time_prs_merged_30d17
first_time_prs_decided_30d23

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach — 50 followers of CrispStrobe
18.4/25Track record — 168 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers50
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginCrispStrobe
public_repos168
account_age_days991
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescrispasr, crispasr, crispasr-sys
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 34 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/crispasr
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscohere-transcribe, cohere-transcribe-03-2026, ggml, speech-recognition, speech-to-text, stt, transcription, whisper-cpp, parakeet, voxtral
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/crispasr
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
5.2/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 83 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:crispasr@0.8.32 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,460

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, bindings/go/Makefile, tests/earnings21/Makefile, tests/librispeech/Makefile, tools/kaggle/voxtral-diff-harness/refsrc/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 42 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, bindings/go/Makefile, tests/earnings21/Makefile, tests/librispeech/Makefile, tools/kaggle/voxtral-diff-harness/refsrc/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.42
toolchain_manifestsbindings/csharp/CrispASR.Tests/CrispASR.Tests.csproj, bindings/csharp/CrispASR/CrispASR.csproj, bindings/go/go.mod, bindings/java/build.gradle, crispasr-sys/Cargo.toml, crispasr/Cargo.toml, examples/crispasr.android.java/app/build.gradle, examples/crispasr.android.java/build.gradle, examples/crispasr.android/app/build.gradle, examples/crispasr.android/build.gradle, examples/crispasr.android/lib/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
52.3/55Manageable file sizes — 106/2,185 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes6,511,018
source_files_sampled2,185
oversized_source_files106

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples, notebooks, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, notebooks, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

612GitHub stars
25contributors
6,481commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
83releases
1bus factor
5open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 104 ⇿
0Stars
104Forks
82Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010232026-042026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 7Patch 73
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 00:53 UTC

7Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities83 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iocrispasr-sys0.8.32crispasr/Cargo.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.20python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 56

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iocrispasr-sys—direct
PyPInumpy—direct
crates.iohound—indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-audio/audiov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-audio/riffv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-audio/wavv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
npmcmake-js^7.1.1indirect
npmcsso3.5.1indirect
npmfs-plus3.1.1indirect
npmjest^29.4.0indirect
npmjquery>=3.4.1indirect
npmkidif1.1.0indirect
npmmustache2.3.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api^5.0.0indirect
npmpuppeteer-core^23.11.1indirect
npmstandard10.0.2indirect
npmuglify-js3.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
PyPIane-transformers—indirect
PyPIcoremltools—indirect
PyPIfasttext—indirect
PyPIfireredasr—indirect
PyPIfunasr—indirect
PyPIgguf—indirect
PyPIgradio—indirect
PyPIhttpx—indirect
PyPIhydra-core—indirect
PyPIjiwer—indirect
PyPIkaldi-native-fbank—indirect
PyPIlibrosa—indirect
PyPImore-itertools—indirect
PyPInemo-toolkit—indirect
PyPIomegaconf—indirect
PyPIopenai-whisper—indirect
PyPIopenvino—indirect
PyPIoverrides—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIregex—indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIsafetensors—indirect
PyPIscipy—indirect
PyPIsentencepiece—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsnac—indirect
PyPIsoundfile—indirect
PyPItorch—indirect
PyPItorchaudio—indirect
PyPItransformers—indirect
PyPItransformers4.57.3indirect
PyPIwespeaker—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:crispasr@0.8.32 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with CrispStrobe/CrispASR. Read them side by side →

95tetherto/qvacOpen-source local AI SDK - run AI on-device with no cloud, no API keys. Supports GGUF, RAG, image, music, and video generation, speech-to-text, P2P inference, and more. Cross-platform: Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, iOS.Exceptional83istupakov/onnx-asrA lightweight Python package for Automatic Speech Recognition using ONNX modelsExcellent86drakulavich/kesha-voice-kitGive your tools a voice — speech to text and back, 25 languages, up to ~19× faster than Whisper. On your machine.Excellent94modelscope/FunASROpen-source speech recognition toolkit for training, inference, streaming ASR, VAD, punctuation, speaker diarization pipelines, and OpenAI-compatible/MCP serving.Exceptional90silverstein/minutesOpen-source, local-first Granola/Otter alternative that Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and any MCP client can query. Meetings, calls, and voice memos transcribed on-device into markdown you own.Excellent87moonshine-ai/moonshineVery low latency speech to text, intent recognition, and text to speech, for building voice agents and interfacesExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.