Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-22 15:15 UTC

CurrencyCloud / currencycloud-net

A .NET wrapper around the v2 API

C#MIT★ 7 stars⑂ 21 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗

CurrencyCloud/currencycloud-net holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (27/100). It was last updated 139 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CurrencycloudOrganization
42 followers10 public repossince Jan 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCurrencyCloud10.0.0-420 days agocurrencycloudapiclientpaymentsforexcurrencynet8netstandard

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 139 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume — 18 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push139
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 35 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 146 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~36.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv9.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release146
mean_days_between_releases36.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
10.8/25Forks — 21 forks
8.3/15Watchers — 32 watchers
Inputs used
forks21
stars7
watchers32
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.4/80Total downloads — 137,387 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCurrencyCloud
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads137,387
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.496
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
26.9/30PR acceptance — 86/96 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs86
open_issues2
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.9
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.7/25Owner reach — 42 followers of CurrencyCloud
19.6/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers42
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginCurrencyCloud
public_repos10
account_age_days4,273

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 42 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCurrencyCloud
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
3/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages43
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitylow 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 43 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.9/40Legible commit history — 48 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.505
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Examples/Cookbook/Cookbook.csproj, Source/CurrencyCloud.Tests/CurrencyCloud.Tests.csproj, Source/CurrencyCloud/CurrencyCloud.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsExamples/Cookbook/Cookbook.csproj, Source/CurrencyCloud.Tests/CurrencyCloud.Tests.csproj, Source/CurrencyCloud/CurrencyCloud.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/137 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes94,539
source_files_sampled137
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — cookbook, examples
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7GitHub stars
16contributors
18commits, last 12 months
139days since last push
35releases
2bus factor
2open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 21 ⇿
0Stars
21Forks
35Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201922016-012021-042026-07
Major 4Minor 17Patch 14

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-22 15:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests9 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
6SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 43

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCurrencyCloud5.3.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms2.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms7.0.4indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack5.2.0indirect
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack6.14.0indirect
NuGetNuGet.CommandLine6.14.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3.11.0indirect
NuGetPolly7.1.0indirect
NuGetPolly7.1.1indirect
NuGetPolly7.2.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Concurrent4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Debug4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Tools4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Tracing4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Globalization4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Compression4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Expressions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Primitives4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.ObjectModel4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.ResourceManager4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Extensions4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Numerics4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Xml.ReaderWriter4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Xml.XDocument4.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 43 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
NuGet.CommandLine6.14.0indirectlow17.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.