Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-11 12:59 UTC

CycloneDX / cyclonedx-dotnet

Creates CycloneDX Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) from .NET Projects

C#Apache-2.0★ 297 stars⑂ 126 forkssince Oct 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

CycloneDX/cyclonedx-dotnet holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (82/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (71/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CycloneDX BOM StandardOrganization · verified domain
940 followers70 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetCycloneDX6.2.1-780 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 107 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year107
human_commit_share0.82
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 62 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~59.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagv6.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases59.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.1/60Stars — 297 stars
17.5/25Forks — 126 forks
5.6/15Watchers — 11 watchers
Inputs used
forks126
stars297
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.9/80Total downloads — 10,335,820 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCycloneDX
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads10,335,820
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 57 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled57
top_contributor_share0.568
How it's scored
34.1/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
16.4/30PR acceptance — 466/852 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs466
open_issues46
closed_issues197
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.811
closed_unmerged_prs386
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21.4/25Owner reach — 940 followers of CycloneDX
25/25Track record — 70 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers940
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginCycloneDX
public_repos70
account_age_days3,422

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 78 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCycloneDX
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cyclonedx.org/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 17 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbom, spdx, dotnet, dotnet-core, bill-of-materials, software-bill-of-materials, package-url, purl, sbom, cyclonedx, owasp, sbom-generator, hacktoberfest, obom, mbom, saasbom, vex
has_wikino
homepagehttps://cyclonedx.org/
docs_sitehttps://cyclonedx.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages15
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.988
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,230
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj, CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj, CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 18 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsCycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj, CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj, CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.18
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/101 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes54,280
source_files_sampled101
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

297GitHub stars
57contributors
107commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
62releases
1bus factor
46open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 126 ⇿
0Stars
126Forks
61Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515012632019-022022-122026-10
Major 6Minor 24Patch 31

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-11 12:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetVerify.XunitV3—CycloneDX.E2ETests/CycloneDX.E2ETests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetRichardSzalay.MockHttp—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—CycloneDX.Tests/CycloneDX.Tests.csproj
NuGetCycloneDX.Core—CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Protocol—CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModel—CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions—CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—CycloneDX/CycloneDX.csproj
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector—direct
NuGetCycloneDX.Core—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMoq—direct
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModel—direct
NuGetNuGet.Protocol—direct
NuGetRichardSzalay.MockHttp—direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions—direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers—direct
NuGetTestcontainers—direct
NuGetVerify.XunitV3—direct
NuGetxunit—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
NuGetxunit.v3—direct
NuGetSwagger-Net8.3.18.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.