Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 12:32 UTC

DEVtheOPS / opencode-plugin-otel

An opencode plugin that exports telemetry via OpenTelemetry (OTLP/gRPC), mirroring the same signals as Claude Code's monitoring.

TypeScriptMPL-2.0★ 105 stars⑂ 39 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

DEVtheOPS/opencode-plugin-otel holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DEVtheOPSOrganization
1 follower16 public repossince Nov 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@devtheops/opencode-plugin-otel1.3.123,110153 days agoopentelemetryoteltelemetryopencodepluginobservability

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume179 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year179
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases18 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~10.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tagv1.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases10.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.7/60Stars105 stars
13.2/25Forks39 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks39
stars105
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
58.2/80Monthly downloads23,110 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@devtheops/opencode-plugin-otel
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads23,110
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.773
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution89% of issues closed
20.4/30PR acceptance53/78 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs53
open_issues2
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of DEVtheOPS
10.3/25Track record16 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginDEVtheOPS
public_repos16
account_age_days252
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history15 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@devtheops/opencode-plugin-otel
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,485
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/29 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes29,050
source_files_sampled29
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

105GitHub stars
14contributors
179commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
18releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 12:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
6SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@arizeai/openinference-semantic-conventions^2.2.0package.json
npm@opencode-ai/plugin^1.14.20package.json
npm@opencode-ai/sdk^1.14.20package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/core^2.8.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-grpc^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-http^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-proto^0.219.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-grpc^0.219.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-http^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-proto^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.8.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-logs^0.213.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics^2.6.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base^2.6.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.40.0package.json
npmtypescript^5.9.3package.json
All dependencies 24

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@arizeai/openinference-semantic-conventions^2.2.0direct
npm@opencode-ai/plugin^1.14.20direct
npm@opencode-ai/sdk^1.14.20direct
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/core^2.8.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-grpc^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-http^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-proto^0.219.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-grpc^0.219.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-http^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-proto^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.8.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-logs^0.213.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics^2.6.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base^2.6.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.40.0direct
npmtypescript^5.9.3direct
npm@types/bunlatestindirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.62.0indirect
npmeslint^9.24.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsdoc^50.6.11indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.