Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 14:32 UTC

DataTables / Vue

Vue plugin for DataTables

VueMIT★ 78 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗

DataTables/Vue holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (21/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

SpryMedia LimitedOrganization

158 followers226 public repossince May 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	datatables.net-vue3	3.0.8	79,649	16	36 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

47Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

31At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 36 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18	Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	7
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	36
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 12 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 36 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~141.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	12
latest_release_tag	3.0.8
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	36
mean_days_between_releases	141.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

45Weak

How it's scored

30.6/60	Stars — 78 stars
9.8/25	Forks — 16 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	16
stars	78
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

58Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

82Excellent

How it's scored

65.3/80	Monthly downloads — 79,649 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	datatables.net-vue3
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	79,649
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 76% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.761

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate

How it's scored

25.5/42	Issue resolution — 61% of issues closed
25/30	PR acceptance — 5/6 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	5
open_issues	13
closed_issues	20
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.606
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
15.8/25	Owner reach — 158 followers of DataTables
25/25	Track record — 226 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	158
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	DataTables
public_repos	226
account_age_days	5,987

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20	Version history — 16 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	datatables.net-vue3
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

9Critical

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 top contributor profilesIran

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 52 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	1.8
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	50
security_posture_after_multiplier	9
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	18

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	64
affected_packages	18
assessed_packages	132
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 13, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 132 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.4/40	Legible commit history — 18 of 47 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.383
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 47
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Vue with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Vue
largest_source_bytes	1,053
source_files_sampled	4
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

78GitHub stars

5contributors

7commits, last 12 months

36days since last push

12releases

1bus factor

13open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿

0Stars

16Forks

11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 1Patch 9

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10

1.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 14:31 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	52 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 132

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/parser	`7.20.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/api-extractor	`7.33.7`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/api-extractor-model	`7.25.3`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/tsdoc	`0.14.2`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/tsdoc-config	`0.16.2`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/node-core-library	`3.53.3`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/rig-package	`0.3.17`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/ts-command-line	`4.13.1`	indirect
npm	@types/argparse	`1.0.38`	indirect
npm	@types/jquery	`3.5.14`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`12.20.24`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`18.11.17`	indirect
npm	@types/sizzle	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@volar/language-core	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	@volar/source-map	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	@volar/typescript	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	@volar/vue-language-core	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	@volar/vue-typescript	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity-transform	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	colors	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	commander	`9.4.1`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-env	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	csstype	`2.6.21`	indirect
npm	datatables.net	`2.0.8`	indirect
npm	datatables.net-dt	`1.13.1`	indirect
npm	datatables.net-select	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	datatables.net-select-dt	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	de-indent	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.16.10`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.10`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	import-lazy	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.11.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jju	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	jquery	`3.6.3`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash.get	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.isequal	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.25.9`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	muggle-string	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.4`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.20`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.17.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.19.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.1`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	rollup	`3.8.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.3.8`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	sourcemap-codec	`1.4.8`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	string-argv	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`4.8.4`	indirect
npm	typescript	`4.9.4`	indirect
npm	universalify	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	validator	`13.7.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.2.45`	indirect
npm	vue-template-compiler	`2.7.14`	indirect
npm	vue-tsc	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	z-schema	`5.0.5`	indirect

Dependency advisories 18

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 132 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 18 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`3.8.1`	indirect	critical	2	`4.59.0`
@vue/server-renderer	`3.2.45`	indirect	high	1	`3.6.0-rc.6`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	8	`5.0.12`
brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect	high	8	`5.0.12`
cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`5.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
nanoid	`3.3.4`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.4.20`	indirect	high	5	`8.5.23`
semver	`7.3.8`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
source-map-js	`1.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`1.2.2`
validator	`13.7.0`	indirect	high	2	`13.15.22`
vite	`4.0.3`	indirect	high	18	`8.0.16`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
esbuild	`0.16.10`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect	moderate	1	—
vue-template-compiler	`2.7.14`	indirect	moderate	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records