Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 17:48 UTC

DavideCarvalho / nestjs-durable

Durable workflows for NestJS — replay-based durability, cross-app & Python steps, control-plane UI

TypeScript · MDXMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

DavideCarvalho/nestjs-durable holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (28/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Davi de CarvalhoPersonal account
66 followers114 public repossince Nov 2015Mobly

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-cli0.2.016265 days ago—
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-core0.67.14,388961 day ago—
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-otel0.3.01,135465 days ago—
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable0.42.02,967583 days agotanstack-intent
PyPIdurable-worker0.23.0-2435 days agodurablenestjsworkerworkflow
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-codegen0.4.033460 days ago—
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-testing0.13.0764173 days ago—
npm@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-dashboard0.43.13,837771 day ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 781 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year781
human_commit_share0.66
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-dashboard@0.43.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

69Good
How it's scored
54.9/80Monthly downloads — 13,140 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-cli, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-core, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-otel, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable, durable-worker, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-codegen, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-testing, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-dashboard
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads13,140
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.9/30PR acceptance — 263/264 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs263
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d28
prs_decided_30d28
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.1/25Owner reach — 66 followers of DavideCarvalho
25/25Track record — 114 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers66
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginDavideCarvalho
public_repos114
account_age_days3,945
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 96 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@dudousxd/nestjs-durable-cli, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-core, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-otel, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable, durable-worker, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-codegen, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-testing, @dudousxd/nestjs-durable-dashboard
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://davidecarvalho.github.io/aviary/docs/durable
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://davidecarvalho.github.io/aviary/docs/durable
docs_sitehttps://davidecarvalho.github.io/aviary/docs/durable
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

28At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

28At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 49 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://davidecarvalho.github.io/aviary/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 66 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://davidecarvalho.github.io/aviary/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — examples/basic/tsconfig.json, packages/admission-redis/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/codegen/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/dashboard/tsconfig.json, packages/diagnostics/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/nestjs/tsconfig.json, packages/otel/tsconfig.json, packages/store-drizzle/tsconfig.json, packages/store-mikro-orm/tsconfig.json, packages/store-prisma/tsconfig.json, packages/store-typeorm/tsconfig.json, packages/telescope/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-bullmq/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-db/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-event-emitter/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-sqs/tsconfig.json, packages/worker/tsconfig.json, website/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 33 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexamples/basic/tsconfig.json, packages/admission-redis/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/codegen/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/dashboard/tsconfig.json, packages/diagnostics/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/nestjs/tsconfig.json, packages/otel/tsconfig.json, packages/store-drizzle/tsconfig.json, packages/store-mikro-orm/tsconfig.json, packages/store-prisma/tsconfig.json, packages/store-typeorm/tsconfig.json, packages/telescope/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-bullmq/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-db/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-event-emitter/tsconfig.json, packages/transport-sqs/tsconfig.json, packages/worker/tsconfig.json, website/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.33
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 5/571 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes227,502
source_files_sampled571
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
781commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'durable-worker' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 17:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests15 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities49 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@orama/orama3.1.18website/package.json
npmfumadocs-core16.9.3website/package.json
npmfumadocs-mdx15.0.11website/package.json
npmfumadocs-ui16.9.3website/package.json
npmlucide-react1.17.0website/package.json
npmnext16.2.7website/package.json
npmreact19.2.7website/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.7website/package.json
npmtailwind-merge3.6.0website/package.json
npm@typescript-eslint/utils^8.0.0packages/eslint-plugin/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with DavideCarvalho/nestjs-durable. Read them side by side →

80egeominotti/bunqueue⚡ High-performance job queue for Bun. SQLite persistence, DLQ, cron jobs, S3 backups. Built for AI agents and automation Excellent80vercel-labs/github-toolsGitHub tools and agents for the Vercel AI SDK, wrap GitHub's API as AI SDK tools ready to plug into any agentExcellent96Azure/durabletaskDurable Task Framework allows users to write long running persistent workflows in C# using the async/await capabilities.Exceptional87microsoft/durabletask-mssqlMicrosoft SQL storage provider for Durable Functions and the Durable Task FrameworkExcellent86microsoft/duroxideExcellent84luno/workflowThe type-safe, event-driven workflow orchestration library that scales with your business. Build robust, distributed workflows in Go with compile-time safety, automatic retries, and horizontal scaling out of the box. Integrate with your existing tech stack using adapters 🚀Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.