Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 06:55 UTC

DefGuard / wireguard-rs

Rust library providing unified WireGuard interface to native/kernel and userspace implementations

RustCustom license★ 325 stars⑂ 35 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗

DefGuard/wireguard-rs holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (41/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

defguardOrganization
258 followers26 public repossince May 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodefguard_wireguard_rs0.11.017,683290 days agonetworkvpnwireguardnetwork-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
14.1/18Commit volume36 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year36
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases29 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~32.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv0.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases32.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.7/60Stars325 stars
12.8/25Forks35 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks35
stars325
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.6/80Monthly downloads17,683 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdefguard_wireguard_rs
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads160,434
monthly_downloads17,683
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.336
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance91/97 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 22/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs91
open_issues5
closed_issues29
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.853
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
17.4/25Owner reach258 followers of DefGuard
18.7/25Track record26 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers258
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginDefGuard
public_repos26
account_age_days1,520
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdefguard_wireguard_rs
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests20 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://github.com/defguard/defguard/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscrate, crates, library, rust, rust-lang, vpn, wireguard, linux, networking, openvpn, wireguard-server, wireguard-vpn
has_wikino
homepagehttps://github.com/defguard/defguard/
docs_sitehttps://github.com/defguard/defguard/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests20 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 22/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes29,462
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

325GitHub stars
10contributors
36commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
29releases
2bus factor
5open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 06:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests20 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 22/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iox25519-dalek3.0Cargo.toml
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 137 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobase640.22.1direct
crates.iolog0.4.33direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.iothiserror1.0.69direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.iox25519-dalek2.0.1direct
crates.iox25519-dalek3.0.0direct
crates.ioaead0.5.2indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.ioblake20.10.6indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobyteorder1.5.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.2.1indirect
crates.iochacha200.9.1indirect
crates.iochacha20poly13050.10.1indirect
crates.iocipher0.4.4indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.0indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.iocurve25519-dalek4.1.3indirect
crates.iocurve25519-dalek5.0.0indirect
crates.iocurve25519-dalek-derive0.1.1indirect
crates.iodefguard_boringtun0.6.7indirect
crates.iodefmt1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-macros1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-parser1.0.0indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.ioenv_filter2.0.0indirect
crates.ioenv_logger0.11.11indirect
crates.iofiat-crypto0.2.9indirect
crates.iofiat-crypto0.3.0indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohex0.4.3indirect
crates.iohmac0.12.1indirect
crates.ioinout0.1.4indirect
crates.ioip_network0.4.1indirect
crates.ioip_network_table0.2.0indirect
crates.ioip_network_table-deps-treebitmap0.5.0indirect
crates.ioipnet2.12.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iojiff0.2.32indirect
crates.iojiff-static0.2.32indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibloading0.8.9indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionetlink-packet-core0.8.1indirect
crates.ionetlink-packet-generic0.4.0indirect
crates.ionetlink-packet-route0.31.0indirect
crates.ionetlink-packet-utils0.6.0indirect
crates.ionetlink-packet-wireguard0.4.0indirect
crates.ionetlink-sys0.8.8indirect
crates.ionix0.31.3indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioopaque-debug0.3.1indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopaste1.0.15indirect
crates.iopastey0.1.1indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopoly13050.8.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic-util0.2.7indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.10.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.16indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_test1.0.177indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.5indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.10indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.44indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iouniversal-hash0.5.1indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowidestring0.4.3indirect
crates.iowindows0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-collections0.3.2indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-future0.3.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-numerics0.3.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows-threading0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowireguard-nt0.5.0indirect
crates.iozeroize1.9.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.