Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 13:42 UTC

DevCycleHQ / php-server-sdk

DevCycle - PHP Server SDK

PHPMIT★ 17 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Nov 2021View on GitHub ↗

#devcycle #feature-flags #feature-toggles #openfeature #continuous-delivery #continuous-deployment #devops

DevCycleHQ/php-server-sdk holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DevCycleOrganization

51 followers32 public repossince Sep 2021Dynatrace LLC

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	devcycle/php-server-sdk	2.2.1	7,795	24	335 days ago	php rest api sdk openapi openapitools openapi-generator

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

45Weak

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.1/36	Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
7/18	Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	5
human_commit_share	0.963
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	3

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 19 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 335 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~91.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	19
latest_release_tag	v2.2.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	335
mean_days_between_releases	91.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk

How it's scored

19.5/60	Stars — 17 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	17
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate

How it's scored

51.9/80	Monthly downloads — 7,795 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20	Registry dependents — 2 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	devcycle/php-server-sdk
dependents	2
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	180,572
monthly_downloads	7,795
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	14
top_contributor_share	0.333

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
10.3/30	PR acceptance — 46/134 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	46
open_issues	0
closed_issues	4
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	88
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

79Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12.3/25	Owner reach — 51 followers of DevCycleHQ
20.8/25	Track record — 32 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	51
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	DevCycleHQ
public_repos	32
account_age_days	1,776

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 335 days ago
20/20	Version history — 24 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	devcycle/php-server-sdk
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	335

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
6/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.devcycle.com/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	devcycle, feature-flags, feature-toggles, openfeature, continuous-delivery, continuous-deployment, devops
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.devcycle.com/
docs_site	https://docs.devcycle.com/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

68Good

How it's scored

10.9/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.8.0 (moderate 5.9), guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.8.1 (moderate 5.9), guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.9.2 (moderate 5.9), +3 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	34
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	83
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 6
direct_affected_packages	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 83 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.7/40	Legible commit history — 38 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.481
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

45Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4.9/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 82 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 82 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.024
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.037

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/40 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	34,337
source_files_sampled	40
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

17GitHub stars

14contributors

5commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

19releases

2bus factor

0open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 13:41 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
3	CI-Tests	7 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 15/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`^7.9.2`	composer.json
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`^2.7.0`	composer.json
Packagist	open-feature/sdk	`^2.0.10`	composer.json

All dependencies 83

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 75 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.0`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.9.2`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.1`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.7.0`	direct
Packagist	open-feature/sdk	`2.0.10`	direct
Packagist	open-feature/sdk	`2.0.4`	direct
Packagist	clue/ndjson-react	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.3`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	devcycle/php-server-sdk	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	devcycle/php-server-sdk	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	evenement/evenement	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.71.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/php-enum	`1.8.4`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/php-enum	`1.8.5`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`10.1.16`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`4.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`10.5.45`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	react/cache	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/child-process	`0.6.6`	indirect
Packagist	react/dns	`1.13.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/event-loop	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/promise	`3.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/socket	`1.16.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/stream	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`3.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`5.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`6.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`5.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`7.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.2.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`7.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.2.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`7.2.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.2.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 83 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
phpunit/phpunit	`10.5.45`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.0`	direct	moderate	7	`7.15.1`
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	direct	moderate	7	`7.15.1`
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.9.2`	direct	moderate	7	`7.15.1`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.1`	direct	moderate	4	`2.12.3`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	direct	moderate	4	`2.12.3`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.7.0`	direct	moderate	4	`2.12.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records