Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 23:03 UTC

Diniboy1123 / usque

Open-source reimplementation of the Cloudflare WARP client's MASQUE protocol.

GoMIT★ 1,226 stars⑂ 152 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

Diniboy1123/usque holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

diniboyPersonal account
66 followers36 public repossince Jun 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/Diniboy1123/usquev1.5.0-14102 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume30 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv4.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases31.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.1/60Stars1,226 stars
18.2/25Forks152 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks152
stars1,226
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.824
How it's scored
36.7/42Issue resolution87% of issues closed
15.7/30PR acceptance11/21 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues9
closed_issues62
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.873
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.1/25Owner reach66 followers of Diniboy1123
23.4/25Track record36 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers66
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginDiniboy1123
public_repos36
account_age_days3,335
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 102 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Diniboy1123/usque
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish102

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmasque, proxy, quic, socks5, tunnel, vpn-client, warp, connect-ip
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: github.com/quic-go/quic-go v0.59.0 (moderate 5.3), golang.org/x/net v0.52.0 (moderate 6.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories38
affected_packages4
assessed_packages25
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 25 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/35 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes14,417
source_files_sampled35
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,226GitHub stars
9contributors
30commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
9open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 23:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3CI-Tests1 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Diniboy1123/connect-ip-gov0.0.0-20260613064811-66cba32d7d33go.mod
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.60.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/songgao/waterv0.0.0-20200317203138-2b4b6d7c09d8go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/txthinking/runnergroupv0.0.0-20250224021307-5864ffeb65aego.mod
Gogithub.com/txthinking/socks5v0.0.0-20260601051520-339b044ab0ebgo.mod
Gogithub.com/vishvananda/netlinkv1.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0go.mod
Gogolang.zx2c4.com/wireguardv0.0.0-20260522210424-ecfc5a8d5446go.mod
Gogvisor.dev/gvisorv0.0.0-20260616165937-8e4bc62602ebgo.mod
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/diniboy1123/connect-ip-gov0.0.0-20260409225322-8d7bb0a858a2direct
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.59.0direct
Gogithub.com/songgao/waterv0.0.0-20200317203138-2b4b6d7c09d8direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/txthinking/runnergroupv0.0.0-20210608031112-152c7c4432bfdirect
Gogithub.com/txthinking/socks5v0.0.0-20251011041537-5c31f201a10edirect
Gogithub.com/vishvananda/netlinkv1.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.52.0direct
Gogolang.zx2c4.com/wireguardv0.0.0-20250521234502-f333402bd9cbdirect
Gogvisor.dev/gvisorv0.0.0-20260408064518-65a410b0d584direct
Gogithub.com/dunglas/httpsfvv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btreev1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpackv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/vishvananda/netnsv0.0.5indirect
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.6.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.49.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260312153236-7ab1446f8b90indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.zx2c4.com/wintunv0.0.0-20230126152724-0fa3db229ce2indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 25 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.49.0indirectcritical270.52.0
github.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.59.0directmoderate20.59.1
golang.org/x/netv0.52.0directmoderate81.26.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.