Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-25 22:14 UTC

DomoApps / ryuu-proxy

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 10 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗

DomoApps/ryuu-proxy holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Domo AppsOrganization

39 followers38 public repossince Jan 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@domoinc/ryuu-proxy	5.1.2	2,331	69	32 days ago	domo domo-apps domoapps proxy middleware express connect koa development local-development ryuu cli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 14 days ago
4.2/36	Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18	Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	16
human_commit_share	0.973
days_since_last_push	14
active_weeks_last_year	6

Release discipline

84Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 32 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~337.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	10
latest_release_tag	v5.1.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	32
mean_days_between_releases	337.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

28At Risk

How it's scored

15.5/60	Stars — 10 stars
5.8/25	Forks — 6 forks
7/15	Watchers — 19 watchers

Inputs used

forks	6
stars	10
watchers	19
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate

How it's scored

44.9/80	Monthly downloads — 2,331 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@domoinc/ryuu-proxy
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,331
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

56Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.446

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good

How it's scored

37.3/42	Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
15.6/30	PR acceptance — 42/81 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	42
open_issues	1
closed_issues	8
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.889
closed_unmerged_prs	39
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
11.5/25	Owner reach — 39 followers of DomoApps
23.6/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	39
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	DomoApps
public_repos	38
account_age_days	4,256

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 32 days ago
20/20	Version history — 69 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@domoinc/ryuu-proxy
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	32

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	26
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@domoinc/ryuu-proxy@5.1.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 26 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

81Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.1/40	Legible commit history — 48 of 71 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.676
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,513

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 73 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 73 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.055
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.027

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/8 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	20,442
source_files_sampled	8
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

10GitHub stars

9contributors

16commits, last 12 months

14days since last push

10releases

2bus factor

1open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿

0Stars

6Forks

2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-25 22:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1	CI-Tests	4 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 14/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
1	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	busboy	`^1.6.0`	package.json
npm	configstore	`^7.1.0`	package.json
npm	ryuu-client	`^5.0.0`	package.json

All dependencies 211

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 208 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	busboy	`1.6.0`	direct
npm	configstore	`7.1.0`	direct
npm	ryuu-client	`5.0.0`	direct
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	@types/body-parser	`1.19.6`	indirect
npm	@types/busboy	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/configstore	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/connect	`3.4.38`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/express	`4.17.24`	indirect
npm	@types/express-serve-static-core	`4.19.7`	indirect
npm	@types/http-errors	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/mime	`1.3.5`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.19.17`	indirect
npm	@types/qs	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	@types/range-parser	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@types/send	`0.17.6`	indirect
npm	@types/send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/serve-static	`1.15.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	array-flatten	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	atomically	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`1.20.6`	indirect
npm	bundle-name	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.3.3`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.4`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	default-browser	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	default-browser-id	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	define-lazy-prop	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	destroy	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	dot-prop	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	express	`4.22.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-docker	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-inside-container	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-wsl	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	mock-req	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	open	`10.2.0`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.6.2`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.3`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`2.5.3`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.60.1`	indirect
npm	run-applescript	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	send	`0.19.0`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`1.16.2`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.10.0`	indirect
npm	streamsearch	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	stubborn-fs	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	stubborn-utils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.16`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`4.41.0`	indirect
npm	type-is	`1.6.18`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	utils-merge	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	when-exit	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	wsl-utils	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	xdg-basedir	`5.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@domoinc/ryuu-proxy@5.1.2 pulls in 26 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records