Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 04:12 UTC

DotNet4Neo4j / Neo4jClient

.NET client binding for Neo4j

C#MS-PL★ 428 stars⑂ 148 forkssince Nov 2013View on GitHub ↗

DotNet4Neo4j/Neo4jClient holds a health index of 23 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (68/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 630 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

23
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

23
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET for Neo4jOrganization
7 followers7 public repossince Oct 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetNeo4jClient5.1.20-631630 days agoneo4jnosqlcypherboltgraph

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 630 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push630
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,173 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~197.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv4.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,173
mean_days_between_releases197.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.7/60Stars — 428 stars
18.1/25Forks — 148 forks
11/15Watchers — 97 watchers
Inputs used
forks148
stars428
watchers97
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MS-PL)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesci.appveyor.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
70.7/80Total downloads — 6,337,411 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNeo4jClient
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads6,337,411
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 76% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 46 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled46
top_contributor_share0.757
How it's scored
30.1/42Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance — 157/186 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs157
open_issues86
closed_issues217
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.716
closed_unmerged_prs29
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of DotNet4Neo4j
18.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginDotNet4Neo4j
public_repos7
account_age_days3,970
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 630 days ago
20/20Version history — 631 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNeo4jClient
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish630

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.nuget.org/packages/Neo4jClient
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/Neo4jClient
docs_sitehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/Neo4jClient
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: Newtonsoft.Json 12.0.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,541 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages15
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 15 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://neo4j.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 75 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://neo4j.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.75
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj, Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsNeo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj, Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/295 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes78,657
source_files_sampled295
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

428GitHub stars
46contributors
0commits, last 12 months
630days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
86open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 148 ⇿
0Stars
148Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014262013-112020-032026-06
Major 1Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 04:11 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluentAssertions6.10.0Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.18.4Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetNSubstitute5.0.0Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.4.2Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5Neo4jClient.Tests/Neo4jClient.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualBasic10.3.0Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
NuGetNeo4j.Driver.Signed5.27.0Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
NuGetSystem.Dynamic.Runtime4.3.0Neo4jClient/Neo4jClient.csproj
All dependencies 15

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetFluentAssertions6.10.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualBasic10.3.0direct
NuGetMoq4.18.4direct
NuGetNeo4j.Driver.Signed4.0.0direct
NuGetNeo4j.Driver.Signed5.27.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetNSubstitute5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Dynamic.Runtime4.3.0direct
NuGetxunit2.4.2direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 15 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.3directhigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.