Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 09:33 UTC

DynamicsValue / fake-xrm-easy-messages

This repo contains mock implementations for Dataverse / CRM OrganizationRequests

C#Custom license★ 2 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗

DynamicsValue/fake-xrm-easy-messages holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (67/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (28/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DynamicsValueOrganization
10 followers30 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
13.5/18Commit volume31 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year31
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases20 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~182.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv3.9.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases182.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars2
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.984
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
28.9/30PR acceptance79/82 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs79
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of DynamicsValue
22.9/25Track record30 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginDynamicsValue
public_repos30
account_age_days3,961

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://dynamicsvalue.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdataverse, framework, mock, power-platform, tdd
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dynamicsvalue.com
docs_sitehttps://dynamicsvalue.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages23
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 11 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.3/40Legible commit history40 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.4
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj, tests/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.Tests/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj, tests/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.Tests/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes17/1,237 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes6,380,457
source_files_sampled1,237
oversized_source_files17

Key facts

2GitHub stars
3contributors
31commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'FakeXrmEasy.Messages' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567722021-122023-012024-03
Major 0Minor 3Patch 5

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 09:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies9.0.2.60src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[8.2.0.2,9.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[8.2.0.1,9.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[8.1.0.2,8.2)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[7.1.1,8.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Extensions[7.1.0.1,8.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[6.1.2,7.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Extensions[6.0.0,7.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Workflow[6.0.0,7.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Deployment[6.0.0,7.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies[5.0.18]src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Extensions[5.0.18]src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Workflow[5.0.18]src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Deployment[5.0.18]src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeItEasy[6.0.0,7.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2011[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2011[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2013[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2013[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2015[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2015[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2016[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2016[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v365[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v365[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v9[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v9[2.9.5-*,3.0)src/FakeXrmEasy.Messages/FakeXrmEasy.Messages.csproj
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 11 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetFakeItEasydirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2011direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2013direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2015direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v2016direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v365direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Abstractions.v9direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2011direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2013direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2015direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v2016direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v365direct
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Core.v9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssembliesdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies5.0.18direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies9.0.2.60direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Deploymentdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Deployment5.0.18direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Extensionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Extensions5.0.18direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Workflowdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CrmSdk.Workflow5.0.18direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector1.2.1indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v2011indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v2013indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v2015indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v2016indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v365indirect
NuGetFakeXrmEasy.Messages.v9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.5.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.console2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 11 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.