Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 05:58 UTC

Elara6331 / itd

Linux companion daemon for the InfiniTime smartwatch firmware

GoGPL-3.0★ 15 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceDesktop applicationCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#golang #linux #pine64 #pinetime #pinetime-companion #unix-socket

Elara6331/itd holds a health index of 35 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (50/100) and lowest on Security (32/100). It was last updated 48 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ElaraPersonal account

53 followers45 public repossince Jul 2018@tallence

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	go.elara.ws/itd	v1.1.0	-	11	1242 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

36Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 48 days ago
2.8/36	Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
9/18	Commit volume — 9 commits in the last year
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

commits_last_year	9
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	48
active_weeks_last_year	4

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 12 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 50 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~195.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	12
latest_release_tag	v1.1.1
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	50
mean_days_between_releases	195.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical

How it's scored

18.6/60	Stars — 15 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	15
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

29At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
9.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	7
top_contributor_share	0.969

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30	PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	0
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.5/25	Owner reach — 53 followers of Elara6331
24.1/25	Track record — 45 public repos, account ~8 yr old

Inputs used

followers	53
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	Elara6331
public_repos	45
account_age_days	2,976

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,242 days ago
20/20	Version history — 11 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	go.elara.ws/itd
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,242

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://gitea.elara.ws/Elara6331/itd
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	golang, linux, pine64, pinetime, pinetime-companion, unix-socket
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://gitea.elara.ws/Elara6331/itd
docs_site	https://gitea.elara.ws/Elara6331/itd
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

25At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
4.5/7.5	Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 32 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	2.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

62Moderate

How it's scored

13/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: google.golang.org/protobuf v1.28.1 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/text v0.21.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 928 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	42
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	78
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 78 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

6Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.9/40	Legible commit history — 11 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.11
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/72 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	47,234
source_files_sampled	72
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — internal/rpc/itd.proto
0/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	internal/rpc/itd.proto
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

15GitHub stars

7contributors

9commits, last 12 months

48days since last push

12releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10

2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 05:58 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
6	Maintained	8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	32 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 17

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	fyne.io/fyne/v2	`v2.3.0`	go.mod
Go	fyne.io/x/fyne	`v0.0.0-20220107050838-c4a1de51d4ce`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cheggaaa/pb/v3	`v3.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gen2brain/dlgs	`v0.0.0-20220603100644-40c77870fa8d`	go.mod
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/v2	`v2.2.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.17`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mozillazg/go-pinyin	`v0.19.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.4.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/urfave/cli/v2	`v2.23.7`	go.mod
Go	go.elara.ws/drpc	`v0.0.0-20230421021209-fe4c05460a3d`	go.mod
Go	go.elara.ws/loggers	`v0.0.0-20240720233522-c61add53e1a3`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.21.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.28.1`	go.mod
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.20.1`	go.mod
Go	storj.io/drpc	`v0.0.32`	go.mod
Go	tinygo.org/x/bluetooth	`v0.15.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 78

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	fyne.io/fyne/v2	`v2.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/cheggaaa/pb/v3	`v3.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gen2brain/dlgs	`v0.0.0-20220603100644-40c77870fa8d`	direct
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/v2	`v2.2.0`	direct
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.17`	direct
Go	github.com/mozillazg/go-pinyin	`v0.19.0`	direct
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.4.3`	direct
Go	github.com/urfave/cli/v2	`v2.23.7`	direct
Go	go.elara.ws/drpc	`v0.0.0-20230421021209-fe4c05460a3d`	direct
Go	go.elara.ws/loggers	`v0.0.0-20240720233522-c61add53e1a3`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.21.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.28.1`	direct
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.20.1`	direct
Go	storj.io/drpc	`v0.0.32`	direct
Go	tinygo.org/x/bluetooth	`v0.15.0`	direct
Go	fyne.io/systray	`v1.10.1-0.20221115204952-d16a6177e6f1`	indirect
Go	github.com/benoitkugler/textlayout	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2	`v2.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.13.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fredbi/uri	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fyne-io/gl-js	`v0.0.0-20220802150000-8e339395f381`	indirect
Go	github.com/fyne-io/glfw-js	`v0.0.0-20220517201726-bebc2019cd33`	indirect
Go	github.com/fyne-io/image	`v0.0.0-20221020213044-f609c6a24345`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-gl/gl	`v0.0.0-20211210172815-726fda9656d6`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-gl/glfw/v3.3/glfw	`v0.0.0-20221017161538-93cebf72946b`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-ole/go-ole	`v1.2.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-text/typesetting	`v0.0.0-20221219135543-5d0d724ee181`	indirect
Go	github.com/goki/freetype	`v0.0.0-20220119013949-7a161fd3728c`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs	`v1.17.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/yamux	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/jsummers/gobmp	`v0.0.0-20151104160322-e2ba15ffa76e`	indirect
Go	github.com/kballard/go-shellquote	`v0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft	`v0.0.0-20220927061507-ef77025ab5aa`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/russross/blackfriday/v2	`v2.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/saltosystems/winrt-go	`v0.0.0-20260317170058-9c2fec580d96`	indirect
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/soypat/cyw43439	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/soypat/lneto	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/soypat/seqs	`v0.0.0-20250124201400-0d65bc7c1710`	indirect
Go	github.com/srwiley/oksvg	`v0.0.0-20221011165216-be6e8873101c`	indirect
Go	github.com/srwiley/rasterx	`v0.0.0-20220730225603-2ab79fcdd4ef`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.8.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tevino/abool	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/tinygo-org/cbgo	`v0.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/tinygo-org/pio	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/vividcortex/ewma	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/xrash/smetrics	`v0.0.0-20201216005158-039620a65673`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.5.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/zeebo/errs	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20241204233417-43b7b7cde48d`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mobile	`v0.0.0-20221110043201-43a038452099`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.32.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.10.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.27.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect
Go	honnef.co/go/js/dom	`v0.0.0-20221001195520-26252dedbe70`	indirect
Go	lukechampine.com/uint128	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/cc/v3	`v3.40.0`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/ccgo/v3	`v3.16.13`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/libc	`v1.22.2`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/mathutil	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/memory	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/opt	`v0.1.3`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/strutil	`v1.1.3`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/token	`v1.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 78 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.28.1`	direct	high	2	`1.33.0`
golang.org/x/image	`v0.2.0`	indirect	high	19	`0.45.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.32.0`	indirect	moderate	16	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.21.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.39.0`
github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.5.3`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.7.17`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.22.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records