Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 13:15 UTC

EngageSoftware / EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging

Enable ILogger<T> dependency injection for DNN Platform

C#MIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#dependency-injection#dnn-platform#logging

EngageSoftware/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Engage SoftwareOrganization
6 followers29 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetEngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging0.1.3-320 days agodnn-platformlogging

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume — 54 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year54
human_commit_share0.45
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
5.4/27Release cadence — a release every ~398.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.1.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases398.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

4Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
45.7/80Total downloads — 25,061 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesEngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads25,061
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 61/66 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs61
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of EngageSoftware
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginEngageSoftware
public_repos29
account_age_days5,164
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 20 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesEngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdependency-injection, dnn-platform, logging
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories20
affected_packages1
assessed_packages26
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 26 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.2/40Legible commit history — 1 of 45 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.022
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 55 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsEngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.55

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes3,725
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
54commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 13:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetDotNetNuke.DependencyInjection9.4.0EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
NuGetDotNetNuke.Instrumentation9.4.0EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.10EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.300EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2026.2.0EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzers1.2.0-beta.556EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging.csproj
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 20 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetDotNetNuke.DependencyInjection9.4.0direct
NuGetDotNetNuke.Instrumentation9.4.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2026.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.300direct
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzers1.2.0-beta.556direct
NuGetDotNetNuke.Core9.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Git10.0.300indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net4721.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.Common10.0.300indirect
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzers.Unstable1.2.0.556indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource10.0.10indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing10.0.8indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectors4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 26 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
DotNetNuke.Core9.4.0indirectcritical2010.2.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with EngageSoftware/EngageSoftware.Dnn.Logging. Read them side by side →

69stratdev3/SimpleWModern Web Server for .NET. Designed for Simplicity. Built for Speed.Good91loopbackio/loopback-nextLoopBack makes it easy to build modern API applications that require complex integrations.Excellent100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnetThe OpenTelemetry .NET ClientExceptional97dnnsoftware/Dnn.PlatformDNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is the leading open source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem.Exceptional96reactiveui/refitThe automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, Refit turns your REST API into a live interface.Exceptional95AzureAD/azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnetIdentityModel extensions for .NETExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.