Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 08:30 UTC

Ethiraric / yaml-rust2

A pure Rust YAML implementation.

RustCustom license★ 261 stars⑂ 28 forkssince Aug 2023forkView on GitHub ↗

Ethiraric/yaml-rust2 holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (41/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EthiraricPersonal account
78 followers23 public repossince Feb 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.ioyaml-rust20.12.04,708,513144 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume34 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases10 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 342 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~66.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv0.10.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release342
mean_days_between_releases66.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.2/60Stars261 stars
11.9/25Forks28 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks28
stars261
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads4,708,513 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesyaml-rust2
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads52,657,902
monthly_downloads4,708,513
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth43 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled43
top_contributor_share0.281
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
18.6/30PR acceptance26/42 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs26
open_issues1
closed_issues36
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.973
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.6/25Owner reach78 followers of Ethiraric
22.1/25Track record23 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers78
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginEthiraric
public_repos23
account_age_days4,936
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesyaml-rust2
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/yaml-rust2/latest/yaml_rust2/
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, yaml, yaml-parser
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.rs/yaml-rust2/latest/yaml_rust2/
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/yaml-rust2/latest/yaml_rust2/
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.5/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages82
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 82 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.3/40Legible commit history38 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.4
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, tools/bench_compare/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
52.1/55Manageable file sizes1/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes89,008
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

261GitHub stars
43contributors
34commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
10releases
3bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 28 ⇿
0Stars
28Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302842024-032025-062026-08
Major 0Minor 2Patch 5

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 08:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2CI-Tests1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioarraydeque0.5.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.33Cargo.toml
crates.iohashlink0.12.1Cargo.toml
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarraydeque0.5.1direct
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.35direct
crates.iohashlink0.12.1direct
crates.ioaddr2line0.24.2indirect
crates.ioadler22.0.0indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.21indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.7indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.97indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.74indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.53indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.53indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.49indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.6indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.4indirect
crates.ioenv_filter2.0.0indirect
crates.ioenv_logger0.11.11indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioescape82590.5.3indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iogimli0.31.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.2indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.9.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.15indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.171indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.178indirect
crates.iolibtest-mimic0.8.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.6indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.8indirect
crates.ioobject0.36.7indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.103indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.94indirect
crates.ioquickcheck1.1.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.40indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.42indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.10.2indirect
crates.iorand_core0.10.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.24indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.20indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.0.0indirect
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9.34+deprecatedindirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.100indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.111indirect
crates.iotoml0.9.5indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.7.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.0.2indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.0.2indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.22indirect
crates.iounsafe-libyaml0.2.11indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.12indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 82 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyhow1.0.97indirectunknown11.0.103

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.