Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 08:30 UTC

ExpressiumOSS / Expressium.LivingDoc

LivingDoc Test Report PlugIn for ReqnRoll Projects

C#MIT★ 9 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jan 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#bdd#gherkin#reqnroll#test-automation

ExpressiumOSS/Expressium.LivingDoc holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Soeren AndersenPersonal account
3 followers3 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetExpressium.LivingDoc.ReqnrollPlugin1.4.6-1560 days agoexpressiumreqnrollbddlivingdoc
NuGetExpressium.LivingDoc1.4.6-1560 days agoexpressiumreqnrollbddlivingdoc

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 387 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year387
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv1.4.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases28.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars — 9 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars9
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
52.4/80Total downloads — 109,723 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesExpressium.LivingDoc.ReqnrollPlugin, Expressium.LivingDoc
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads109,723
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.997

Issue & PR responsiveness

49Weak
How it's scored
35.5/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
7.5/30PR acceptance — 1/4 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues2
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.846
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

29At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of ExpressiumOSS
9/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginExpressiumOSS
public_repos3
account_age_days851
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 60 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesExpressium.LivingDoc.ReqnrollPlugin, Expressium.LivingDoc
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish60

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbdd, gherkin, reqnroll, test-automation
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

15Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/124 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes37,508
source_files_sampled124
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

9GitHub stars
3contributors
387commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 08:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetReqnroll.CustomPlugin3.3.4Expressium.LivingDoc.ReqnrollPlugin/Expressium.LivingDoc.ReqnrollPlugin.csproj
NuGetlog4net3.3.2Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetSelenium.Support4.46.0Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetSelenium.WebDriver4.46.0Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.10Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.10Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.10Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.6.1Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetReqnroll3.3.4Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetReqnroll.NUnit3.3.4Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetReqnroll.Tools.MsBuild.Generation3.3.4Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetWebDriverManager2.17.7Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UITests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.6.1Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetCucumber.CCK29.2.2Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests/Expressium.LivingDoc.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetAngleSharp1.5.2Expressium.LivingDoc/Expressium.LivingDoc.csproj
NuGetCucumber.Messages34.2.0Expressium.LivingDoc/Expressium.LivingDoc.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAngleSharp1.5.2direct
NuGetCucumber.CCK29.2.2direct
NuGetCucumber.Messages34.2.0direct
NuGetlog4net3.3.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetNUnit4.6.1direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0direct
NuGetReqnroll3.3.4direct
NuGetReqnroll.CustomPlugin3.3.4direct
NuGetReqnroll.NUnit3.3.4direct
NuGetReqnroll.Tools.MsBuild.Generation3.3.4direct
NuGetSelenium.Support4.46.0direct
NuGetSelenium.WebDriver4.46.0direct
NuGetWebDriverManager2.17.7direct
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ExpressiumOSS/Expressium.LivingDoc. Read them side by side →

75iti-ict/wakamitiBDD testing tool using step librariesGood19e2e-test-quest/uuvSolution to facilitate the writing and execution of E2E tests understandable by any humanCritical71lemonlion/KronikolA mechanism for tracking the request-responses in your tests and converting them into PlantUML diagrams.Good62Romfos/AutoTests.FrameworkBddDotNet based autotest framework with Playwright integration for .NETModerate39DeLaphante/CynkyAutomationPowered by Selenium and Reqnroll with detailed HTML reporting, Automatic Element Waiting & Logging capabilities - CynkyAutomation framework can handle any website that is built using AJAX, React, AngularJS, Vue.js, Single Page Applications, Salesforce, Dynamics 365 CRM and many more.Weak98cucumber/cucumber-jsCucumber for JavaScriptExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.