Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 11:46 UTC

Findit-AI / mediaframe

A common vocabulary of pixel-format and color-metadata types for video processing pipelines.

RustApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Findit-AI/mediaframe holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (63/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

45
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

findit-studioOrganization
1 follower35 public repossince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iomediaframe0.1.97,595107 days agocolormediapixel-formatvideono-stdmultimedia
crates.ioxtaskpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.496516 days agoautomationcodesignmacosreleasextaskcommand-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
14.7/18Commit volume — 42 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year42
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
51.7/80Monthly downloads — 7,595 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmediaframe
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads22,786
monthly_downloads7,595
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.881

Issue & PR responsiveness

97Exceptional
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.1/30PR acceptance — 32/33 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs32
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of findit-studio
11.5/25Track record — 35 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginfindit-studio
public_repos35
account_age_days36
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmediaframe
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/mediaframe
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/mediaframe
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsCargo.toml, mediaframe/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 8/243 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes133,570
source_files_sampled243
oversized_source_files8

Key facts

1GitHub stars
3contributors
42commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobitflags2mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more2mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iomediatime0.1mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf2mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioicu_locale_core2mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iobuffa0.8mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol_str0.3mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary1mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquickcheck1mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquickcheck-richderive0.3mediaframe/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettyplease0.2xtask/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Findit-AI/mediaframe. Read them side by side →

87algesten/str0mA Sans I/O WebRTC implementation in Rust.Excellent80YeautyYE/ez-ffmpegA safe and ergonomic Rust interface for FFmpeg integration, designed for ease of use.Excellent96hashintel/hash🚀 The open-source, multi-tenant platform for self-building knowledge graphs and simulationExceptional93moq-dev/moqMedia over QUIC: Real-time latency at massive scaleExceptional87pdeljanov/SymphoniaPure Rust multimedia format demuxing, tag reading, and audio decoding libraryExcellent86cloudflare/moq-rsRust implementation of the IETF MoQ Transport protocolExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.