Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-01 13:23 UTC

FirelyTeam / firely-validator-api

Firely's official FHIR validator API for validating HL7 FHIR resources against profiles.

C#Custom license★ 14 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗

FirelyTeam/firely-validator-api holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FirelyOrganization · verified domain
111 followers68 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 224 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year224
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~35.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv3.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases35.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
18.1/60Stars — 14 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars14
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
63.1/80Total downloads — 1,178,938 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesFirely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3, Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5, Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3, Firely.Fhir.Validation
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,178,938
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.339
How it's scored
26.4/42Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
24.4/30PR acceptance — 382/470 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs382
open_issues81
closed_issues137
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.628
closed_unmerged_prs88
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
14.7/25Owner reach — 111 followers of FirelyTeam
25/25Track record — 68 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers111
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginFirelyTeam
public_repos68
account_age_days4,619

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesFirely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3, Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B, Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5, Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3, Firely.Fhir.Validation
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages11
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 11 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.6/40Legible commit history — 61 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.685
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 27 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.27
toolchain_manifestssrc/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3.csproj, src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj, test/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj, test/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.Tests.R4/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.R4.Tests.csproj, test/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.Tests.R4B/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.R4B.Tests.csproj, test/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.Tests.R5/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.R5.Tests.csproj, test/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.Tests.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3.Tests.csproj, test/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Tests/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Tests.csproj, test/Hl7.Fhir.Validation.Tests/Hl7.Fhir.Validation.R5.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/237 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes43,835
source_files_sampled237
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

14GitHub stars
10contributors
224commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
31releases
2bus factor
81open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-032025-062026-08
Major 1Minor 8Patch 14

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-01 13:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetHl7.Fhir.STU3$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.STU3.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Base$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Conformance$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.Compilation.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R4$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R4B$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R4B.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R5$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5/Firely.Fhir.Validation.R5.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.STU3$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3/Firely.Fhir.Validation.STU3.csproj
NuGetMessagePack.Annotations3.1.10src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Base$(FirelySdkVersion)src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2src/Firely.Fhir.Validation/Firely.Fhir.Validation.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 12 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Base—direct
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Conformance—direct
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R4—direct
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R4B—direct
NuGetHl7.Fhir.R5—direct
NuGetHl7.Fhir.STU3—direct
NuGetMessagePack.Annotations3.1.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.11.0-beta1.24219.2direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2direct
npmde.basisprofil.r40.9.13indirect
npmhl7.fhir.r4.core4.0.1indirect
npmKBV.Basis1.1.3indirect
npmkbv.ita.erp1.0.2indirect
npmkbv.itv.evdga1.0.0-ccindirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetFirely.Fhir.Validation.R4—indirect
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Specification.Data.R4—indirect
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Specification.Data.R4B—indirect
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Specification.Data.R5—indirect
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Specification.Data.STU3—indirect
NuGetHl7.Fhir.Validation.Legacy.R55.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 11 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.