Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 02:30 UTC

FlexibleEngineCloud / terraform-provider-flexibleengine

Terraform flexibleengine provider

GoMPL-2.0★ 29 stars⑂ 45 forkssince May 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

FlexibleEngineCloud/terraform-provider-flexibleengine holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 882 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

16 followers26 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/FlexibleEngineCloud/terraform-provider-flexibleenginev1.46.0-64912 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 882 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push882
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases43 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 912 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~37.9 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tagv1.46.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release912
mean_days_between_releases37.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars29 stars
13.7/25Forks45 forks
5.6/15Watchers11 watchers
Inputs used
forks45
stars29
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.238
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance749/809 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs749
open_issues24
closed_issues287
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.923
closed_unmerged_prs60
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.8/25Owner reach16 followers of FlexibleEngineCloud
22.4/25Track record26 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers16
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginFlexibleEngineCloud
public_repos26
account_age_days3,291
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 912 days ago
20/20Version history64 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/FlexibleEngineCloud/terraform-provider-flexibleengine
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish912

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/flexibleengine/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, terraform-provider, flexibleengine
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/flexibleengine/
docs_sitehttps://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/flexibleengine/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go 1.34.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,680 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories73
affected_packages7
assessed_packages64
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, moderate 2, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 64 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapGNUmakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesGNUmakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/577 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes40,149
source_files_sampled577
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

29GitHub stars
97contributors
0commits, last 12 months
882days since last push
43releases
3bus factor
24open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 45 ⇿
0Stars
45Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030404022018-062021-052024-04
Major 0Minor 31Patch 12

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 02:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.34.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/chnsz/golangsdkv0.0.0-20231027080141-c5721e2542e4go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-sdk-go-v3v0.1.62go.mod
Gogithub.com/huaweicloud/terraform-provider-huaweicloudv1.57.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalencev1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespathv0.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 51 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.34.0direct
Gogithub.com/chnsz/golangsdk0.0.0-20231027080141-c5721e2542e4direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrap1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp0.5.2direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierror1.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuid1.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v22.24.0direct
Gogithub.com/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-sdk-go-v30.1.62direct
Gogithub.com/huaweicloud/terraform-provider-huaweicloud1.57.0direct
Gogithub.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedir1.1.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshtein1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-cidr1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v1313.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/color1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gehirninc/crypt0.0.0-20200316065508-bb7000b8a962indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpoint0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cty1.4.1-0.20200414143053-d3edf31b6320indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclog1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-plugin1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-version1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-install0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v22.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutils1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-exec0.17.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-json0.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go0.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-log0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-address0.0.0-20220623143253-7d51757b572cindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost0.0.0-20200729002733-f050f53b9734indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamux0.0.0-20181012175058-2f1d1f20f75dindirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/keybase/go-crypto0.0.0-20200123153347-de78d2cb44f4indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorable0.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructure1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrap1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalk1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180228061459-e0a39a4cb421indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/run1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tjfoc/gmsm1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v44.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-cty1.11.0indirect
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver1.12.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.14.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20230410155749-daa745c078e1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.56.3indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.33.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v11.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 64 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.17.0indirectcritical390.56.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.56.3indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver1.12.0indirectmoderate22.4.2
golang.org/x/net0.17.0indirectmoderate181.27.0-rc.3
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.34.0directunknown2
golang.org/x/sys0.15.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.14.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.