Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 02:27 UTC

Fody / Costura

Embed references as resources

C#MIT★ 2,542 stars⑂ 279 forkssince Feb 2013View on GitHub ↗

Fody/Costura holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (84/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (24/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FodyOrganization
166 followers31 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCostura.Fody6.2.0-46120 days agoilmergeilweavingembedresourcefodycecil

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume149 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year149
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year36
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases6 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,828 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~116.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tag5.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,828
mean_days_between_releases116.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
55.2/60Stars2,542 stars
20.4/25Forks279 forks
9.9/15Watchers62 watchers
Inputs used
forks279
stars2,542
watchers62
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
72.4/80Total downloads9,289,333 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCostura.Fody
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads9,289,333
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.626
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
25.1/30PR acceptance619/740 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs619
open_issues3
closed_issues393
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.992
closed_unmerged_prs121
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16/25Owner reach166 followers of Fody
23/25Track record31 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers166
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginFody
public_repos31
account_age_days4,989

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 120 days ago
20/20Version history46 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCostura.Fody
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish120

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

24At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 13 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
18/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md (stub)
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/AssemblyToProcess/AssemblyToProcess.csproj, src/AssemblyToReference/AssemblyToReference.csproj, src/AssemblyToReferencePreEmbedded/AssemblyToReferencePreEmbedded.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/AssemblyToProcess/AssemblyToProcess.csproj, src/AssemblyToReference/AssemblyToReference.csproj, src/AssemblyToReferencePreEmbedded/AssemblyToReferencePreEmbedded.csproj, src/AssemblyToReferenceWithRuntimeReferences/AssemblyToReferenceWithRuntimeReferences.csproj, src/AssemblyWithoutInitialize/AssemblyWithoutInitialize.csproj, src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj, src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj, src/Costura.Fody/Costura.Fody.csproj, src/Costura.Template/Costura.Template.csproj, src/Costura/Costura.csproj, src/ExeToProcess/ExeToProcess.csproj, src/ExeToProcessWithMultipleNative/ExeToProcessWithMultipleNative.csproj, src/ExeToProcessWithNative/ExeToProcessWithNative.csproj, src/ExeToProcessWithNativeAndEmbeddedMixed/ExeToProcessWithNativeAndEmbeddedMixed.csproj, src/ExeToReference/ExeToReference.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/76 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes24,739
source_files_sampled76
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,542GitHub stars
23contributors
149commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
3open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Costura.Fody.Tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 279 ⇿
0Stars
279Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030027652013-082020-012026-07
Major 0Minor 4Patch 2

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 02:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient7.0.1src/AssemblyToReferenceWithRuntimeReferences/AssemblyToReferenceWithRuntimeReferences.csproj
NuGetCatel.Core5.12.22src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.5.1src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.6.0src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0src/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests/Costura.Fody.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetFodyHelpers6.9.3src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.5.1src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.6.0src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.NUnit31.16.3src/Costura.Fody.Tests/Costura.Fody.Tests.csproj
NuGetFodyHelpers6.9.3src/Costura.Fody/Costura.Fody.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net481.0.3src/Costura.Fody/Costura.Fody.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Costura.Template/Costura.Template.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3src/Costura/Costura.csproj
NuGetConfluent.Kafka2.5.3src/ExeToProcessWithMultipleNative/ExeToProcessWithMultipleNative.csproj
All dependencies 13

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCatel.Core5.12.22direct
NuGetConfluent.Kafka2.5.3direct
NuGetFody6.9.3direct
NuGetFodyHelpers6.9.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient7.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.5.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net481.0.3direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNUnit4.6.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0direct
NuGetVerify.NUnit31.16.3direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 13 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.