Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 01:51 UTC

FriendsOfSymfony / FOSJsRoutingBundle

A pretty nice way to expose your Symfony routing to client applications.

PHP · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 1,502 stars⑂ 259 forkssince May 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

FriendsOfSymfony/FOSJsRoutingBundle holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Vitality (32/100). It was last updated 317 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FriendsOfSymfonyOrganization
105 followers18 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistfriendsofsymfony/jsrouting-bundle3.6.1949,23456317 days agoroutingjs-routingjavascript
npmfos-router2.4.67,291151514 days agoroutersymfony

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

32At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 317 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7/18Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year5
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push317
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 43 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 317 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~135.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tag3.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release317
mean_days_between_releases135.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.5/60Stars — 1,502 stars
20.1/25Forks — 259 forks
8.4/15Watchers — 34 watchers
Inputs used
forks259
stars1,502
watchers34
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicestravis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
79.7/80Monthly downloads — 949,234 downloads/month across packagist
16.5/20Registry dependents — 295 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesfriendsofsymfony/jsrouting-bundle
dependents295
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads58,352,275
monthly_downloads949,234
unverified_packages_excludedfos-router

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 94 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled94
top_contributor_share0.345
How it's scored
34.4/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
19.8/30PR acceptance — 143/217 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs143
open_issues51
closed_issues230
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.819
closed_unmerged_prs74
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.6/25Owner reach — 105 followers of FriendsOfSymfony
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers105
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginFriendsOfSymfony
public_repos18
account_age_days5,751
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 317 days ago
20/20Version history — 56 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfriendsofsymfony/jsrouting-bundle, fos-router
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish317

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, symfony, symfony-bundle, routing, javascript
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
5.4/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: loader-utils 1.2.3 (critical 9.8)
32.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,436 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages1
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:fos-router@2.4.6 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 6 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history — 49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Resources/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsResources/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (Resources/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/35 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes19,266
source_files_sampled35
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,502GitHub stars
94contributors
5commits, last 12 months
317days since last push
43releases
3bus factor
51open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 259 ⇿
0Stars
259Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025024852011-072018-122026-04
Major 2Minor 18Patch 22

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 01:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests3 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 50 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@bpnetguy/webpack-inject-plugin^2.0.4Resources/package.json
Packagistsymfony/console^5.4|^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^2.1|^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^5.4|^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/serializer^5.4|^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistwilldurand/jsonp-callback-validator~1.1|^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 21

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 15 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bpnetguy/webpack-inject-plugin^2.0.4direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/serializer—direct
Packagistwilldurand/jsonp-callback-validator—direct
npm@types/node^14.18.10indirect
npmgoogle-closure-library^20220104.0.0indirect
npmgulp^4.0.2indirect
npmgulp-rename^2.0.0indirect
npmgulp-typescript^6.0.0-alpha.1indirect
npmgulp-uglify^3.0.2indirect
npmgulp-wrap^0.15.0indirect
npmjasmine^4.0.2indirect
npmtsd^0.19.1indirect
npmtypescript^4.5.5indirect
Packagistjakoch/phantomjs-installer—indirect
Packagistneronmoon/scriptsdev—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistsymfony/expression-language—indirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridge—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing npm:fos-router@2.4.6 pulls in 6 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
loader-utils1.2.3indirectcritical33.2.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist, npm.