Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 21:06 UTC

GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL / go-core-mongo

GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗

GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL/go-core-mongo holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GPA Gruppo Progetti Avanzati SRLOrganization · verified domain
4 followers45 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL/go-core-mongov0.0.19-1751 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
18/36Commit cadence26/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume71 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year71
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year26
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases17 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 51 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~34.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv0.0.19
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release51
mean_days_between_releases34.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.893
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
20/30PR acceptance2/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach4 followers of GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL
24.1/25Track record45 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginGPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL
public_repos45
account_age_days2,342

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 51 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL/go-core-mongo
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish51

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages1
assessed_packages91
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 91 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.9/40Legible commit history58 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.58
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/21 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes19,134
source_files_sampled21
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
71commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 21:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL/go-core-appv0.0.29-0.20260916103925-732c51fed2f5go.mod
Gogithub.com/GPA-Gruppo-Progetti-Avanzati-SRL/tpm-mongo-commonv1.0.24-0.20260806095729-fb30bfd3074bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1go.mod
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2v2.8.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 85 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/gpa-gruppo-progetti-avanzati-srl/go-core-appv0.0.29-0.20260916103925-732c51fed2f5direct
Gogithub.com/gpa-gruppo-progetti-avanzati-srl/tpm-mongo-commonv1.0.24-0.20260806095729-fb30bfd3074bdirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1direct
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2v2.8.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.15indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gpa-gruppo-progetti-avanzati-srl/tpm-commonv0.1.95indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.30.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ipfans/fxloggerv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kimmachinegun/automemlimitv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasjones/reggenv0.0.0-20200904144131-37ba4fa293bbindirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/pbnjay/memoryv0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.24.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.70.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/otlptranslatorv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/pbkdf2v1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/scramv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/stringprepv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/youmark/pkcs8v0.0.0-20240726163527-a2c0da244d78indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/prometheusv0.71.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/exporters/autoexportv0.71.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.71.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/autopropv0.71.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/awsv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/b3v1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/jaegerv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/otv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploggrpcv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploghttpv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetricgrpcv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/prometheusv0.68.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutlogv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutmetricv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/logv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/logv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.46.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/digv1.19.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260825221802-da73d73af1c5indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260825221802-da73d73af1c5indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.2indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 91 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.