Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-16 01:28 UTC

GalacticDynamics / coordinax

Coordinates in JAX

PythonMIT★ 38 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#coordinate-systems#coordinate-transformation#coordinates#jax#multiple-dispatch#quax#reference-frames#vectors#python

GalacticDynamics/coordinax holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (57/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GalacticDynamicsOrganization
36 followers18 public repossince Nov 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcoordinax0.24.34,706640 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 481 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year481
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 67 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~40 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count67
latest_release_tagv0.23.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases40
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

32At Risk
How it's scored
25.4/60Stars — 38 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars38
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
49/80Monthly downloads — 4,706 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescoordinax
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,706
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.994

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance — 887/924 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs887
open_issues30
closed_issues90
prs_merged_7d15
prs_decided_7d15
prs_merged_30d44
prs_decided_30d48
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs37
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.3/25Owner reach — 36 followers of GalacticDynamics
15.2/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers36
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginGalacticDynamics
public_repos18
account_age_days1,071

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescoordinax
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://coordinax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscoordinate-systems, coordinate-transformation, coordinates, jax, multiple-dispatch, quax, reference-frames, vectors, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://coordinax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
docs_sitehttps://coordinax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
4.5/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages189
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 189 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

91Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.979
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,642

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

98Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
11/11Static type checking — packages/coordinaxs.api/src/coordinaxs/api/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.astro/src/coordinaxs/astro/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.curveframes/src/coordinaxs/curveframes/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.hypothesis/src/coordinaxs/hypothesis/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.interop.astropy/src/coordinaxs/interop/astropy/py.typed, src/coordinax/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 94 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnoxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/coordinaxs.api/src/coordinaxs/api/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.astro/src/coordinaxs/astro/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.curveframes/src/coordinaxs/curveframes/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.hypothesis/src/coordinaxs/hypothesis/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.interop.astropy/src/coordinaxs/interop/astropy/py.typed, src/coordinax/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.94
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/coordinaxs.api/src/coordinaxs/api/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.astro/src/coordinaxs/astro/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.curveframes/src/coordinaxs/curveframes/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.hypothesis/src/coordinaxs/hypothesis/py.typed, packages/coordinaxs.interop.astropy/src/coordinaxs/interop/astropy/py.typed, src/coordinax/py.typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 3/500 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes95,801
source_files_sampled500
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

38GitHub stars
3contributors
481commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
67releases
1bus factor
30open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:coordinax@0.24.3; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
59Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512024-022025-022026-01
Major 0Minor 15Patch 35

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-16 01:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
6Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIastropy>=7.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbeartype>=0.21.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcoordinaxs.api>=0.24pyproject.toml
PyPIdataclassish>=0.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIequinox>=0.13.8pyproject.toml
PyPIjax>=0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjaxlib>=0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjaxtyping>=0.3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIoptional-dependencies>=0.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIoptype>=0.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIplum>=2.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIplum>=2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIquax>=0.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIquax-blocks>=0.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIquaxed>=0.10.5pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.13.2pyproject.toml
PyPIzeroth>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIunxt>=2.0.5pyproject.toml
PyPIunxts.linalg>=2.0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIwadler-lindig>=0.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIxmmutablemap>=0.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 180 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIastropy—direct
PyPIastropy7.2.0direct
PyPIbeartype0.22.9direct
PyPIcoordinaxs-api—direct
PyPIdataclassish0.9.0direct
PyPIequinox0.13.8direct
PyPIjax0.10.0direct
PyPIjaxlib0.10.0direct
PyPIjaxtyping—direct
PyPIjaxtyping0.3.9direct
PyPIoptional-dependencies—direct
PyPIoptional-dependencies0.5.0direct
PyPIoptype0.17.0direct
PyPIplum—direct
PyPIplum2.9.0direct
PyPIquax0.4.3direct
PyPIquax-blocks0.5.0direct
PyPIquaxed0.10.5direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIunxt—direct
PyPIunxt2.0.5direct
PyPIunxts-linalg2.0.6direct
PyPIwadler-lindig0.1.7direct
PyPIxmmutablemap0.2.1direct
PyPIzeroth1.2.0direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.3indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIastropy-iers-data0.2026.5.4.1.4.54indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.3.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.15.1indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoordinax—indirect
PyPIcoordinaxs-astro—indirect
PyPIcoordinaxs-hypothesis—indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcz-conventional-gitmoji0.7.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.20indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdiffrax—indirect
PyPIdiffrax0.7.2indirect
PyPIdiffraxtra—indirect
PyPIdiffraxtra1.5.2indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.0indirect
PyPIgriffe2.3.0indirect
PyPIgriffecli2.3.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.15.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis—indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.152.4indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.2.0indirect
PyPIipython9.13.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIis-annotated1.0.1indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjaxmore0.3.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-cache1.0.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.8.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlineax0.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImyst-nb1.4.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.0.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.4indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInox2026.4.10indirect
PyPInox-uv0.7.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.5indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.4.0indirect
PyPIoptimistix—indirect
PyPIoptimistix0.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIplum-dispatch2.10.1indirect
PyPIprek0.4.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-theme0.17.1indirect
PyPIpyerfa2.0.1.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.5indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-arraydiff0.6.1indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-codspeed5.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-env1.6.0indirect
PyPIpytest-github-actions-annotate-failures0.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.10.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-book-theme1.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.10.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-tippy0.4.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-togglebutton0.4.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph0.13.0indirect
PyPIsphinxext-rediraffe0.3.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.49indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIsybil10.0.1indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.9indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.0indirect
PyPIty0.0.34indirect
PyPIunxt-api2.0.0indirect
PyPIunxts-api2.0.0indirect
PyPIunxts-hypothesis—indirect
PyPIunxts-hypothesis2.0.0indirect
PyPIunxts-parametric—indirect
PyPIunxts-parametric2.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.46.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.13indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.7.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.47.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 189 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with GalacticDynamics/coordinax. Read them side by side →

98keras-team/kerasDeep Learning for humansExceptional98PennyLaneAI/pennylanePennyLane is an open-source quantum software platform for quantum computing, quantum machine learning, and quantum chemistry. Create meaningful quantum algorithms, from inspiration to implementation.Exceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100aws/aws-sam-cliCLI tool to build, test, debug, and deploy Serverless applications using AWS SAMExceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional100astropy/astropyAstronomy and astrophysics core libraryExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.