Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-09 03:08 UTC

GalacticDynamics / jaxmore

There's more to JAX.

PythonMIT★ 10 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#autodifferentiation#high-performance#high-performance-computing#jax#loops#vectorization

GalacticDynamics/jaxmore holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GalacticDynamicsOrganization
36 followers18 public repossince Nov 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIjaxmore0.4.18,21850 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

63Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share0.583
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~35.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.4.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases35.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars — 10 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars10
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
52.2/80Monthly downloads — 8,218 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesjaxmore
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads8,218
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance — 27/31 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs27
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.3/25Owner reach — 36 followers of GalacticDynamics
15.1/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers36
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginGalacticDynamics
public_repos18
account_age_days1,064

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjaxmore
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pypi.org/project/jaxmore
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsautodifferentiation, high-performance, high-performance-computing, jax, loops, vectorization
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pypi.org/project/jaxmore
docs_sitehttps://pypi.org/project/jaxmore
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages2
assessed_packages104
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 104 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

97Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
11/11Static type checking — src/jaxmore/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 24 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 24 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnoxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/jaxmore/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.208
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.417

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/jaxmore/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes36,919
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

10GitHub stars
1contributors
22commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:jaxmore@0.4.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-09 03:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIjax>=0.4.20pyproject.toml
PyPIjaxtyping>=0.3.7pyproject.toml
PyPIoptional_dependencies>=0.3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 104

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIjax0.6.2direct
PyPIjax0.9.0direct
PyPIjaxtyping0.3.7direct
PyPIoptional-dependencies0.4.0direct
PyPIabsl-py2.5.0indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.3indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.3indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIchex0.1.90indirect
PyPIchex0.1.92indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.13.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.2indirect
PyPIcz-conventional-gitmoji0.7.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.20indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIequinox0.13.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIhumanize4.15.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.1.0indirect
PyPIipython8.38.0indirect
PyPIipython9.10.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIisort7.0.0indirect
PyPIjax-tqdm0.4.0indirect
PyPIjaxlib0.6.2indirect
PyPIjaxlib0.9.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.8.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.8indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInox2025.11.12indirect
PyPInox-uv0.7.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.2indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.4.0indirect
PyPIoptax0.2.8indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprek0.4.9indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.4indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-github-actions-annotate-failures0.3.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsybil9.3.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.8indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.4indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwadler-lindig0.1.7indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.5.3indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 104 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
tornado6.5.8indirecthigh36.5.9
virtualenv20.36.1indirecthigh821.7.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with GalacticDynamics/jaxmore. Read them side by side →

90GalacticDynamics/unxtUnitful Quantities in JAXExcellent81GalacticDynamics/phasecurvefitConstruct Paths through Phase-Space PointsExcellent80mpi4jax/mpi4jaxZero-copy MPI communication of JAX arrays, for turbo-charged HPC applications in Python :zap:Excellent83AdaptiveCpp/AdaptiveCppCompiler for multiple programming models (SYCL, C++ standard parallelism, HIP/CUDA) for CPUs and GPUs from all vendors: The independent, community-driven compiler for C++-based heterogeneous programming models. Lets applications adapt themselves to all the hardware in the system - even at runtime!Excellent56sebishogun/simdHardware-accelerated whole-slice SIMD vector primitives for Go (AVX-512, AVX2, NEON, SVE2, RVV) — zero cgo, zero dependencies, 100% portable Go fallback.Moderate100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.