Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 17:16 UTC

Ganyu-Studios / Hoshimi

Another lavalink client with some interesting things.

TypeScriptMIT★ 17 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Ganyu-Studios/Hoshimi holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ganyu StudiosOrganization
7 followers10 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmhoshimi0.5.54,14217421 days agodiscordlavalinklavalink-v4distubemusic-botlavalink-playerlavalink-clientmusic

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 11 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 325 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year325
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year44

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 21 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~25 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv5.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases25
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk
How it's scored
19.5/60Stars — 17 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars17
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
48.2/80Monthly downloads — 4,142 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshoshimi
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,142
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.967

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
28.3/30PR acceptance — 34/36 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of Ganyu-Studios
14.9/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginGanyu-Studios
public_repos10
account_age_days1,331

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 21 days ago
20/20Version history — 174 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshoshimi
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://hoshimi.js.org
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://hoshimi.js.org
docs_sitehttps://hoshimi.js.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:hoshimi@0.5.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://hoshimi.js.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 78 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://hoshimi.js.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.839
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/66 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes29,876
source_files_sampled66
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

17GitHub stars
7contributors
325commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812026-052026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 17:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmws^8.21.3package.json
All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 203 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmws8.21.3direct
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.11indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.2indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.147.0indirect
npm@quansync/fs1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.3.0indirect
npm@types/node26.4.0indirect
npm@types/ws8.18.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-android-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-freebsd-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-android-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-freebsd-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl0.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-arm640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-x640.8.7indirect
npm@yuku-toolchain/types0.8.7indirect
npmansis4.3.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmcac7.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdts-resolver3.0.0indirect
npmempathic2.0.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig5.0.0-beta.5indirect
npmhookable6.1.1indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmimport-without-cache0.4.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlint-staged17.4.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.16indirect
npmquansync1.0.0indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmrolldown1.2.6indirect
npmrolldown-plugin-dts0.27.14indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmstring-argv0.3.2indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtsdown0.22.14indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtsx4.23.12indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmunconfig-core7.5.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmverkit0.3.2indirect
npmvite8.1.3indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmyuku-ast0.8.7indirect
npmyuku-codegen0.8.7indirect
npmyuku-parser0.8.7indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:hoshimi@0.5.5 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Ganyu-Studios/Hoshimi. Read them side by side →

75Tomato6966/lavalink-clientEasy, flexible and feature-rich lavalink@v4 Client. Both for Beginners and Proficients.Good54Moodeng-LAB/moodenglinknew lavalink wrapper with a very full system with performance !Moderate86Aiko-IT-Systems/DisCatSharpYour library to write discord apps in C# with focus on always providing access to the latest discord featuresExcellent75discordx-ts/discordx🤖 Create a discord bot with TypeScript and Decorators!Good54debaucheryparty/lavendethe sweet scent of native discord audio 🪻Moderate93twilight-rs/twilightPowerful, flexible, and scalable ecosystem of Rust libraries for the Discord API.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.