Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-24 22:18 UTC

Gernott / mask

TYPO3 Extension Mask

PHPGPL-2.0★ 132 stars⑂ 80 forkssince May 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginWeb interfacehow this is determined

Gernott/mask holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Gernot PloinerPersonal account
13 followers20 public repossince Jul 2012WEBprofil - Gernot Ploiner e.U.

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistmask/mask⚠ friendsoftypo3/content-blocksv9.0.1223,62319331 days agowizardmasktypo3-cmscontentelements

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 28 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 31 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~70.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv8.3.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases70.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.3/60Stars — 132 stars
15.8/25Forks — 80 forks
6.8/15Watchers — 18 watchers
Inputs used
forks80
stars132
watchers18
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
58.3/80Monthly downloads — 23,623 downloads/month across packagist
6/20Registry dependents — 7 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmask/mask
dependents7
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,771,465
monthly_downloads23,623
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.604
How it's scored
41.4/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
22.8/30PR acceptance — 169/222 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs169
open_issues7
closed_issues456
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.985
closed_unmerged_prs53
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of Gernott
21.6/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginGernott
public_repos20
account_age_days5,193
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 31 days ago
20/20Version history — 193 published versions
0/20Not deprecated — mask/mask: friendsoftypo3/content-blocks
Inputs used
packagesmask/mask
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedyes
min_days_since_publish31

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.facebook.com/typo3mask
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.facebook.com/typo3mask
docs_sitehttps://www.facebook.com/typo3mask
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
20.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: vue 2.7.14 (moderate 5.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
35.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 709 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories21
affected_packages7
assessed_packages70
unassessed_packages15
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 5, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 70 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
9.2/40Legible commit history — 17 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.172
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 4/175 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes186,922
source_files_sampled175
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

132GitHub stars
56contributors
4commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
7open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@mask/mask' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 80 ⇿
0Stars
80Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060807942015-112020-082025-05
Major 2Minor 5Patch 87

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-24 22:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained2 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmsass^1.43.5Build/package.json
npmvue^2.7.14Build/package.json
npmvuedraggable^2.24.3Build/package.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^13.4 || ^12.4composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^13.4 || ^12.4composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid^13.4 || ^12.4composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid-styled-content^13.4 || ^12.4composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-install^13.4 || ^12.4composer.json
All dependencies 85

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmsass1.43.5direct
npmvue2.7.14direct
npmvuedraggable2.24.3direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid-styled-content—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-install—direct
npm@babel/parser7.20.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.14indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.17indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs23.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve15.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-replace5.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.0indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc2.7.14indirect
npmacorn8.8.1indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmbuiltin-modules3.3.0indirect
npmchokidar3.5.2indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmcsstype3.1.1indirect
npmdeepmerge4.2.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmglob8.0.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-builtin-module3.2.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.11.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.26.7indirect
npmminimatch5.1.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.6indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.31indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.1indirect
npmrollup3.6.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-minification0.2.0indirect
npmsortablejs1.10.2indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmsourcemap-codec1.4.8indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmterser5.16.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Packagistbnf/phpstan-psr-container—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistfriendsoftypo3/phpstan-typo3—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagisttypo3/coding-standards—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework—indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 70 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rollup3.6.0indirectcritical24.59.0
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
minimatch5.1.1indirecthigh310.2.3
nanoid3.3.6indirecthigh45.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.4.31indirecthigh48.5.23
vue2.7.14directmoderate13.0.0-alpha.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.