Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 06:04 UTC

GetStream / stream-video-android

📲 Android Video SDK. Stream's versatile Core + Compose UI component libraries that allow you to build video calling, audio room, and, live streaming apps based on Webrtc running on Stream's global edge network.

KotlinCustom license★ 475 stars⑂ 58 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceMobile applicationLibraryhow this is determined
#android#chat#jetpack-compose#kotlin#video#video-api#video-sdk#videoview#android-video-call#webrtc

GetStream/stream-video-android holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (59/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StreamOrganization · verified domain
1,572 followers495 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 290 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year290
human_commit_share0.66
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.32.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases12.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good
How it's scored
43.4/60Stars — 475 stars
14.6/25Forks — 58 forks
7.7/15Watchers — 25 watchers
Inputs used
forks58
stars475
watchers25
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

51Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.414

Issue & PR responsiveness

95Exceptional
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance — 1,380/1,515 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 23/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs1,380
open_issues2
closed_issues270
prs_merged_7d13
prs_decided_7d14
prs_merged_30d36
prs_decided_30d39
issue_closed_ratio0.993
closed_unmerged_prs135
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

98Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
23/25Owner reach — 1,572 followers of GetStream
25/25Track record — 495 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,572
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginGetStream
public_repos495
account_age_days4,393

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://getstream.io/video/docs/android
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsandroid, chat, jetpack-compose, kotlin, video, video-api, video-sdk, videoview, android-video-call, webrtc
has_wikino
homepagehttps://getstream.io/video/docs/android
docs_sitehttps://getstream.io/video/docs/android
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 23/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

56Moderate
How it's scored
11.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: puma 6.6.0 (high 7.5), sinatra 4.1.1 (moderate 5.3), json 2.10.2 (low 3.7)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
30.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 334 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories34
affected_packages11
assessed_packages114
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 5, moderate 4, low 1
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 114 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://getstream.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 65 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://getstream.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.985
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,643

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

92Excellent
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — benchmark/build.gradle.kts, build-logic/convention/build.gradle.kts, build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
11/11Static type checking — Kotlin (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 18 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.18
toolchain_manifestsbenchmark/build.gradle.kts, build-logic/convention/build.gradle.kts, build.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, demo-app/build.gradle.kts, metrics/stream-video-android-metrics/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-bom/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-core/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-filters-video/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-previewdata/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-ui-compose/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-ui-core/build.gradle.kts, stream-video-android-ui-xml/build.gradle.kts, tutorials/tutorial-audio/build.gradle.kts, tutorials/tutorial-livestream/build.gradle.kts, tutorials/tutorial-ringing/build.gradle.kts, tutorials/tutorial-video/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 11/1,051 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageKotlin
largest_source_bytes221,656
source_files_sampled1,051
oversized_source_files11

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — stream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/event/events.proto, stream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/models/models.proto, stream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/signal_rpc/signal.proto
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesstream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/event/events.proto, stream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/models/models.proto, stream-video-android-core/src/main/proto/video/sfu/signal_rpc/signal.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

475GitHub stars
27contributors
290commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
2open issues
Maven, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 58 ⇿
0Stars
58Forks
91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605842023-062024-122026-05
Major 1Minor 28Patch 62

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10
7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 06:03 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 23/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsfastlane2.225.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjson—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop1.38Gemfile
RubyGemssinatra—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-performance—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-require_tools—Gemfile
RubyGemspuma—Gemfile
RubyGemsrackup—Gemfile
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsfastlane2.225.0direct
RubyGemsjson2.10.2direct
RubyGemspuma6.6.0direct
RubyGemsrackup2.2.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.38.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.19.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-require_tools0.1.2direct
RubyGemssinatra4.1.1direct
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.7indirect
RubyGemsartifactory3.0.17indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsatomos0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsaws-eventstream1.3.2indirect
RubyGemsaws-partitions1.1083.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-core3.222.1indirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-kms1.99.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-s31.183.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-sigv41.11.0indirect
RubyGemsbabosa1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsbase640.2.0indirect
RubyGemsCFPropertyList3.0.7indirect
RubyGemsclaide1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscolored1.2indirect
RubyGemscolored23.1.2indirect
RubyGemscommander4.6.0indirect
RubyGemsdeclarative0.0.20indirect
RubyGemsdigest-crc0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsdomain_name0.6.20240107indirect
RubyGemsdotenv2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsemoji_regex3.2.3indirect
RubyGemsexcon0.112.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday1.10.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-cookie_jar0.0.7indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-em_http1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-em_synchrony1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-excon1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-httpclient1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http_persistent1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-patron1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-rack1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday_middleware1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsfastimage2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfastlane-plugin-stream_actions0.3.74indirect
RubyGemsfastlane-sirp1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsgh_inspector1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-androidpublisher_v30.54.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-core0.11.3indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-iamcredentials_v10.17.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-playcustomapp_v10.13.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-storage_v10.31.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-core1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-env1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-errors1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-storage1.47.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogleauth1.8.1indirect
RubyGemshighline2.0.3indirect
RubyGemshttp-cookie1.0.8indirect
RubyGemshttpclient2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsjmespath1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsjwt2.10.1indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_magick4.13.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.15.0indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.0.3indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnanaimo0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnaturally2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.4indirect
RubyGemsnkf0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsoptparse0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsos1.1.4indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.26.3indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.7.4indirect
RubyGemsplist3.7.2indirect
RubyGemsprism1.4.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix6.0.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.1.12indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.2.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.10.0indirect
RubyGemsrepresentable3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsretriable3.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.1indirect
RubyGemsrouge2.0.7indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.44.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemssecurity0.1.5indirect
RubyGemssignet0.19.0indirect
RubyGemssimctl1.6.10indirect
RubyGemssysrandom1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsterminal-notifier2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table3.0.2indirect
RubyGemstilt2.6.0indirect
RubyGemstrailblazer-option0.1.2indirect
RubyGemstty-cursor0.7.1indirect
RubyGemstty-screen0.8.2indirect
RubyGemstty-spinner0.9.3indirect
RubyGemsuber0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsword_wrap1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsxcodeproj1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsxcpretty0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsxcpretty-travis-formatter1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsxctest_list1.2.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 114 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rack-session2.1.0indirectcritical22.1.2
puma6.6.0directhigh28.0.2
addressable2.8.7indirecthigh12.9.0
faraday1.10.4indirecthigh22.14.3
jwt2.10.1indirecthigh13.2.0
rack3.1.12indirecthigh213.2.6
sinatra4.1.1directmoderate14.2.0
aws-sdk-s31.183.0indirectmoderate11.208.0
excon0.112.0indirectmoderate11.5.0
rexml3.4.1indirectmoderate13.4.2
json2.10.2directlow12.19.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with GetStream/stream-video-android. Read them side by side →

96GetStream/stream-chat-android:speech_balloon: Android Chat SDK ➜ Stream Chat API. UI component libraries for chat apps. Kotlin & Jetpack Compose messaging SDK for Android chatExceptional98jitsi/jitsi-meetJitsi Meet - Secure, Simple and Scalable Video Conferences that you use as a standalone app or embed in your web application.Exceptional94livekit/client-sdk-react-nativeOfficial React Native SDK for LiveKit.Exceptional94kirillzyusko/react-native-keyboard-controller⌨️ Keyboard manager which works in identical way on both iOS and AndroidExceptional91THEOplayer/react-native-theoplayerA React Native THEOplayerView componentExcellent96getsentry/sentry-javaA Sentry SDK for Java, Android and other JVM languages.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.