Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 15:46 UTC

Granga / etsy-ts

Etsy API wrapper written in typescript

TypeScriptMIT★ 44 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jan 2017View on GitHub ↗

Granga/etsy-ts holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (65/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (34/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RistoPersonal account
11 followers8 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmetsy-ts8.0.116,2846534 days agoetsyapitypescripttswrapper

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 34 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume30 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 34 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~44.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv8.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases44.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.5/60Stars44 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars44
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.2/80Monthly downloads16,284 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesetsy-ts
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads16,284
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 94% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.941
How it's scored
39/42Issue resolution93% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance8/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues1
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.929
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of Granga
18.9/25Track record8 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginGranga
public_repos8
account_age_days4,676
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history65 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesetsy-ts
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/etsy-ts
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsetsy, api, wrapper, typescript, javascript, promise, v3, client, library, etsy-api-v3
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/etsy-ts
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/etsy-ts
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:etsy-ts@8.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.8/40Legible commit history9 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.09
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes1/39 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes165,986
source_files_sampled39
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

44GitHub stars
4contributors
30commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712020-122023-052025-09

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 15:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmaxios^1.14.0package.json
npmaxios-auth-refresh^3.3.6package.json
npmform-data^4.0.5package.json
npmtslib^2.5.0package.json
All dependencies 141

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 137 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmaxios1.14.0direct
npmaxios-auth-refresh3.3.6direct
npmform-data4.0.5direct
npmtslib2.8.1direct
npm@babel/code-frame7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.27.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@exodus/schemasafe1.3.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.4indirect
npm@types/fs-extra9.0.13indirect
npm@types/lodash4.17.20indirect
npm@types/lodash.unescape4.0.9indirect
npm@types/node14.18.63indirect
npm@types/parse-json4.0.2indirect
npm@types/swagger-schema-official2.0.22indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.4indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.12indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-me-maybe1.0.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcosmiconfig7.0.1indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer4.0.1indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdidyoumean1.2.2indirect
npmdiff4.0.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmes6-promise3.3.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmeta2.2.0indirect
npmfast-safe-stringify2.1.1indirect
npmfetch-blob3.2.0indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.15.11indirect
npmformdata-polyfill4.0.10indirect
npmfs-extra10.1.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhttp2-client1.3.5indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjsonfile6.2.0indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlodash.unescape4.0.1indirect
npmmake-dir3.1.0indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmnanoid3.3.4indirect
npmnode-domexception1.0.0indirect
npmnode-emoji1.11.0indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmnode-fetch3.3.2indirect
npmnode-fetch-h22.3.0indirect
npmnode-readfiles0.2.0indirect
npmoas-kit-common1.0.8indirect
npmoas-linter3.2.2indirect
npmoas-resolver2.5.6indirect
npmoas-schema-walker1.1.5indirect
npmoas-validator5.0.8indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprettier2.7.1indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmreftools1.1.9indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmshould13.2.3indirect
npmshould-equal2.0.0indirect
npmshould-format3.0.3indirect
npmshould-type1.4.0indirect
npmshould-type-adaptors1.1.0indirect
npmshould-util1.0.1indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmswagger-schema-official2.0.0-bab6bedindirect
npmswagger-typescript-api12.0.4indirect
npmswagger2openapi7.0.8indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtypescript4.8.4indirect
npmtypescript4.9.5indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.1indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmweb-streams-polyfill3.3.3indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyaml1.10.2indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:etsy-ts@8.0.1 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.