Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 16:12 UTC

HEPTACOM / HeptacomShopwarePlatformAdminOpenAuth

Shopware plugin to allow open auth logins in the administration

PHP · JavaScript · TwigApache-2.0★ 37 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗

#ecommerce #shopware #shopware-plugin #oauth #shopware-platform-plugin

HEPTACOM/HeptacomShopwarePlatformAdminOpenAuth holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HEPTACOM GmbHOrganization

6 followers42 public repossince Dec 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	heptacom/shopware-platform-admin-open-auth	9.0.0	6,379	51	217 days ago	ecommerce oauth administration saml shopware openid-connect shopware-platform open-authentication

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18	Commit volume — 68 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	68
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

80Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 53 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 69 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~50.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	53
latest_release_tag	8.1.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	69
mean_days_between_releases	50.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

25.2/60	Stars — 37 stars
9.3/25	Forks — 14 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	14
stars	37
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

51Moderate

How it's scored

50.7/80	Monthly downloads — 6,379 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	heptacom/shopware-platform-admin-open-auth
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	157,989
monthly_downloads	6,379
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

44Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.506

Issue & PR responsiveness

48Weak

How it's scored

34.3/42	Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
7.5/30	PR acceptance — 4/16 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	4
open_issues	7
closed_issues	31
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.816
closed_unmerged_prs	12
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
6.1/25	Owner reach — 6 followers of HEPTACOM
23.9/25	Track record — 42 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	6
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	HEPTACOM
public_repos	42
account_age_days	2,401

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 217 days ago
20/20	Version history — 51 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	heptacom/shopware-platform-admin-open-auth
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	217

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

43Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

28At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.heptacom.de/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ecommerce, shopware, shopware-plugin, oauth, shopware-platform-plugin
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.heptacom.de/
docs_site	https://www.heptacom.de/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

75Good

How it's scored

16.3/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.8.1 (moderate 5.9), guzzlehttp/psr7 2.6.2 (moderate 5.3)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	22
affected_packages	8
assessed_packages	69
unassessed_packages	22
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 6
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 69 resolved dependencies against OSV. 22 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.6/40	Legible commit history — 18 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.18
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/246 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	87,707
source_files_sampled	246
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

37GitHub stars

13contributors

68commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

53releases

1bus factor

7open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿

0Stars

14Forks

44Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 6Minor 3Patch 11

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 16:12 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`^4.2`	composer.json
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`^7.5`	composer.json
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`^2.4`	composer.json
Packagist	league/oauth2-client	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	league/oauth2-server	`^9.1`	composer.json
Packagist	mrjoops/oauth2-jira	`^0.2.4`	composer.json
Packagist	mtdowling/jmespath.php	`^2.7`	composer.json
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`^1.5`	composer.json
Packagist	onelogin/php-saml	`^4.1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/cache	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^3`	composer.json
Packagist	shopware/core	`~6.7.0`	composer.json
Packagist	web-token/jwt-library	`^4.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 70 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`—`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`—`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`—`	direct
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	direct
Packagist	league/oauth2-client	`—`	direct
Packagist	league/oauth2-server	`—`	direct
Packagist	mrjoops/oauth2-jira	`—`	direct
Packagist	mtdowling/jmespath.php	`—`	direct
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`—`	direct
Packagist	onelogin/php-saml	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/cache	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-client	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.0`	direct
Packagist	shopware/core	`—`	direct
Packagist	web-token/jwt-library	`—`	direct
Packagist	bmitch/churn-php	`1.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	boxblinkracer/phpunuhi	`1.18.0`	indirect
Packagist	brick/math	`0.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer-unused/contracts	`0.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer-unused/symbol-parser	`0.2.5`	indirect
Packagist	composer/composer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	deeplcom/deepl-php	`1.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	ext-json	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-mbstring	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-openssl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-zlib	`—`	indirect
Packagist	firebase/php-jwt	`6.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/auth	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/cloud-core	`1.56.2`	indirect
Packagist	google/cloud-translate	`1.17.3`	indirect
Packagist	google/common-protos	`4.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/gax	`1.30.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/grpc-gcp	`0.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/longrunning	`0.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	google/protobuf	`3.25.3`	indirect
Packagist	grpc/grpc	`1.57.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	icanhazstring/composer-unused	`0.8.11`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`3.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.19.1`	indirect
Packagist	ondram/ci-detector	`4.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	orhanerday/open-ai	`3.5`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/discovery	`1.19.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/multipart-stream-builder	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`1.27.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`1.10.64`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules	`1.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-strict-rules	`1.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/collection	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`4.7.5`	indirect
Packagist	rize/uri-template	`0.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	shopware/administration	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/config	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`6.4.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php83	`1.29.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`6.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/property-access	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/property-info	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/serializer	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`3.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/validator	`7.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`7.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`6.4.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/glob	`4.7.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 69 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 22 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google/protobuf	`3.25.3`	indirect	high	1	`4.33.6`
symfony/process	`6.4.4`	indirect	high	2	`8.0.5`
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	direct	moderate	7	`7.15.1`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	direct	moderate	4	`2.12.3`
firebase/php-jwt	`6.10.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.0.0`
symfony/validator	`7.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.1.4`
symfony/yaml	`6.4.3`	indirect	moderate	3	`8.0.12`
symfony/yaml	`7.0.3`	indirect	moderate	3	`8.0.12`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records