Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 04:52 UTC

Hugolify / hugolify-theme-publications

Publications section for Hugolify

HTML · JavaScript · CSSNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#hugo#hugolify#bootstrap

Hugolify/hugolify-theme-publications holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HugolifyOrganization
22 followers63 public repossince Feb 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/hugolify/hugolify-theme-publications/v2v2.3.0-45 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.6/18Commit volume — 24 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year24
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~69.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count39
latest_release_tagv2.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases69.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.96

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.8/25Owner reach — 22 followers of Hugolify
20.2/25Track record — 63 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers22
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginHugolify
public_repos63
account_age_days1,315

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/hugolify/hugolify-theme-publications/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshugo, hugolify, bootstrap
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages108
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 108 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.hugolify.io/llms.txt)
18.3/40Legible commit history — 34 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.hugolify.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.343
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

25At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 99
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes4,366
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
24commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
39releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'hugolify-theme-publications' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 04:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 108

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 108 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bundled-es-modules/deepmerge4.3.2indirect
npm@bundled-es-modules/glob13.0.6indirect
npm@bundled-es-modules/memfs4.17.0indirect
npm@hugolify/prettier-config0.3.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/base641.1.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/base6417.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/buffers1.2.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/buffers17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/codegen1.0.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/codegen17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-core4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-fsa4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-builtins4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-to-fsa4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-utils4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-print4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-snapshot4.57.6indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pack1.21.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pack17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pointer1.0.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pointer17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/util1.9.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/util17.67.0indirect
npm@uncinq/component-tokens1.1.0indirect
npm@uncinq/design-tokens1.1.1indirect
npm@zip.js/zip.js2.8.26indirect
npmassert2.1.0indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.7indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.9indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchange-case5.4.4indirect
npmcolorjs.io0.5.2indirect
npmcommander12.1.0indirect
npmcomponent-emitter2.0.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfor-each0.3.5indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgenerator-function2.0.1indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob-to-regex.js1.2.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhyperdyperid1.2.0indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-arguments1.2.0indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-generator-function1.1.2indirect
npmis-nan1.3.2indirect
npmis-plain-obj4.1.0indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.15indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.1indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmemfs4.57.6indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobject-is1.1.6indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.7indirect
npmpath0.12.7indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpath-unified0.2.0indirect
npmpossible-typed-array-names1.1.0indirect
npmprettier3.8.4indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmpunycode1.4.1indirect
npmqs6.15.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.1.0indirect
npmset-function-length1.2.2indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmstream0.0.3indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstyle-dictionary5.4.4indirect
npmthingies2.6.0indirect
npmtinycolor21.6.0indirect
npmtree-dump1.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmurl0.11.4indirect
npmutil0.10.4indirect
npmutil0.12.5indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.22indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 108 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.6indirecthigh35.0.9
qs6.15.2indirectmoderate26.16.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Hugolify/hugolify-theme-publications. Read them side by side →

88gethinode/hinodeHinode is a production-ready Hugo theme built on Bootstrap 5. Open source, actively maintained, and built for developers.Excellent88zetxek/adritian-free-hugo-themeAdritian - High performance Hugo Theme for Personal Websites. With job experience, portfolio, dark/light theme, blog, multi-language and best frontend practices out of the box.Excellent60Hugolify/hugolify-themeHugolify theme is a framework-agnostic core theme for HugoModerate59gethinode/mod-bootstrapA Hugo module to add the Bootstrap toolkit to your Hinode siteModerate53Hugolify/hugolify-adminAdmin for Hugolify allowing the build of the config file for different Headless (CloudCannon, Decap, Netlify, Pages, Static, Sveltia and Tina CMS)Moderate50Hugolify/hugolify-theme-bootstrapCSS and JS Bootsrap for hugolify-themeModerate

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.