Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 11:21 UTC

HxHippy / PWGen

Engineered from the ground up in Rust, PWGen leverages the language's guarantees of memory safety and performance to provide a fast, reliable, and secure vault for your most critical data. Your secrets are protected with a multi-layered, military-grade encryption strategy, utilizing industry-standard algorithms like AES-256.

RustCustom license★ 7 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined
#apache2#cli#encryption#gui#rust#secret-management#secrets#command-line#cybersecurity#data-security#developer-tools#encryption-decryption#privacy#security-tools

HxHippy/PWGen holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (47/100) and lowest on Security (23/100). It was last updated 72 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HxHippyPersonal account
2 followers12 public repossince Mar 2020@KiefStudioMA

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

32At Risk
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 72 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year7
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push72
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

47Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 421 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release421
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

13Critical
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars7
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 69% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.688

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

42Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of HxHippy
20.1/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginHxHippy
public_repos12
account_age_days2,347
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pwgenrust.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapache2, cli, encryption, gui, rust, secret-management, secrets, command-line, cybersecurity, data-security, developer-tools, encryption-decryption, privacy, security-tools
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pwgenrust.dev
docs_sitehttps://pwgenrust.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

23At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

23At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 13 of 26 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml, pwgen-core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 26
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml, pwgen-core/Cargo.toml, pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml, pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

92Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
46.8/55Manageable file sizes — 3/20 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes156,020
source_files_sampled20
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

7GitHub stars
2contributors
7commits, last 12 months
72days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'pwgen-cli' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'pwgen-gui' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'pwgen-core' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'pwgen-server' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212025-062025-072025-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 11:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 57
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iopwgen-core—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iorpassword—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarboard—pwgen-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-gcm—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioargon2—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosqlx—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv—pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0pwgen-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iopwgen-core—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioegui0.29pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeframe0.29pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iopng0.17pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarboard3.4pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iorfd0.14pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopen5.0pwgen-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iopwgen-core—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.7pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.4pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http0.5pwgen-server/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with HxHippy/PWGen. Read them side by side →

99trufflesecurity/trufflehogFind, verify, and analyze leaked credentialsExceptional96usebruno/brunoOpensource IDE For Exploring and Testing API's (lightweight alternative to Postman/Insomnia)Exceptional98bevyengine/bevyA refreshingly simple data-driven game engine built in RustExceptional98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional98uutils/coreutilsCross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutilsExceptional98zama-ai/tfhe-rsTFHE-rs: A Pure Rust implementation of the TFHE Scheme for Boolean and Integer Arithmetics Over Encrypted Data.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.