Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 11:51 UTC

IDuxFE / idux

🚀 A UI Component Library for Vue3.x

TypeScript · VueMIT★ 574 stars⑂ 149 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

IDuxFE/idux holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (41/100). It was last updated 170 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IDuxFEOrganization
20 followers14 public repossince Nov 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@idux/cdk2.11.01,116103256 days agovuevue3vue-3.xfrontendframeworkuicdkcomponentcomponentsdevelopmentkit
npm@idux/pro2.11.0802123256 days agovuevue3vue-3.xfrontendframeworkuicomponentcomponentspro
npm@idux/components2.11.01,937133256 days agovuevue3vue-3.xfrontendframeworkuicomponentcomponents

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

41Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 170 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18Commit volume — 28 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year28
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push170
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,044 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv1.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,044
mean_days_between_releases7.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.7/60Stars — 574 stars
18.1/25Forks — 149 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks149
stars574
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, dev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
47.8/80Monthly downloads — 3,855 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@idux/cdk, @idux/pro, @idux/components
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,855
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.43
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 1,607/1,703 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs1,607
open_issues39
closed_issues305
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.887
closed_unmerged_prs96
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of IDuxFE
20.1/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginIDuxFE
public_repos14
account_age_days2,109
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 256 days ago
20/20Version history — 133 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@idux/cdk, @idux/pro, @idux/components
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish256

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://idux.site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscomponents, ui-components, vue, vue3, typescript, idux
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://idux.site
docs_sitehttps://idux.site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@idux/cdk@2.11.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,489 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes240,764
source_files_sampled1,489
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

574GitHub stars
56contributors
28commits, last 12 months
170days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
39open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 149 ⇿
0Stars
149Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014862020-122023-082026-05
Major 1Minor 12Patch 9

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 11:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop^1.2.1packages/cdk/package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-auto-scroll^1.4.0packages/cdk/package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-hitbox^1.0.3packages/cdk/package.json
npm@floating-ui/dom^1.6.7packages/cdk/package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21packages/cdk/package.json
npm@emotion/hash^0.9.1packages/components/package.json
npm@idux/cdk2.11.0packages/components/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.1.0packages/components/package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21packages/components/package.json
npm@idux/cdk2.11.0packages/pro/package.json
npm@idux/components2.11.0packages/pro/package.json
npmajv^8.16.0packages/pro/package.json
npmajv-formats^3.0.1packages/pro/package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21packages/pro/package.json
npm@idux/cdk2.11.0packages/site/package.json
npm@idux/components2.11.0packages/site/package.json
npm@idux/pro2.11.0packages/site/package.json
npmcodesandbox^2.2.3packages/site/package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21packages/site/package.json
npmvue^3.2.29packages/site/package.json
npmvue-router^4.2.4packages/site/package.json
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 96 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop^1.2.1direct
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-auto-scroll^1.4.0direct
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-hitbox^1.0.3direct
npm@emotion/hash^0.9.1direct
npm@floating-ui/dom^1.6.7direct
npm@idux/cdk2.11.0direct
npm@idux/components2.11.0direct
npm@idux/pro2.11.0direct
npmajv^8.16.0direct
npmajv-formats^3.0.1direct
npmcodesandbox^2.2.3direct
npmdate-fns^4.1.0direct
npmlodash-es^4.17.21direct
npmvue^3.2.29direct
npmvue^3.4.31direct
npmvue^3.5.9direct
npmvue-router^4.2.4direct
npmvue-router^4.4.0direct
npm@babel/core^7.24.7indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.24.7indirect
npm@babel/preset-typescript^7.24.7indirect
npm@commitlint/cli^17.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-angular^17.8.1indirect
npm@ctrl/tinycolor^4.1.0indirect
npm@juggle/resize-observer^3.4.0indirect
npm@ls-lint/ls-lint^1.11.2indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-alias^5.1.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs^26.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve^15.2.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-replace^5.0.7indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils^5.1.0indirect
npm@types/bluebird^3.5.42indirect
npm@types/figlet^1.5.8indirect
npm@types/fs-extra^9.0.13indirect
npm@types/gulp^4.0.17indirect
npm@types/inquirer^8.2.10indirect
npm@types/lodash-es^4.17.12indirect
npm@types/marked^4.3.2indirect
npm@types/node^18.19.39indirect
npm@types/prismjs^1.26.4indirect
npm@types/rimraf^4.0.0indirect
npm@types/svgo^2.6.4indirect
npm@types/yaml-front-matter^4.1.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^6.21.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^4.6.2indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue-jsx^3.1.0indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-c8^0.24.5indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v8^2.1.1indirect
npm@vue/babel-plugin-jsx^1.2.2indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/eslint-config-prettier^8.0.0indirect
npm@vue/eslint-config-typescript^11.0.3indirect
npm@vue/reactivity^3.4.31indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/shared^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/test-utils^2.4.6indirect
npmc8^7.14.0indirect
npmchalk^4.1.2indirect
npmcodecov^3.8.3indirect
npmcz-git^1.9.3indirect
npmesbuild^0.15.18indirect
npmeslint^8.57.0indirect
npmeslint-import-resolver-custom-alias^1.3.2indirect
npmeslint-plugin-header^3.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.29.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsdoc^46.10.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier^5.1.3indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue^9.27.0indirect
npmfast-glob^3.3.2indirect
npmfiglet^1.7.0indirect
npmfs-extra^10.1.0indirect
npmgulp^4.0.2indirect
npmhappy-dom^12.10.3indirect
npmhusky^8.0.3indirect
npminquirer^8.2.6indirect
npmjsdom^25.0.1indirect
npmlerna^7.4.2indirect
npmless^4.2.0indirect
npmlint-staged^13.3.0indirect
npmlodash^4.17.21indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli^0.32.2indirect
npmmarked^4.3.0indirect
npmnpm-run-all^4.1.5indirect
npmora^5.4.1indirect
npmparse5^7.1.2indirect
npmpostcss^8.4.39indirect
npmpostcss-less^6.0.0indirect
npmprettier^3.3.2indirect
npmprismjs^1.29.0indirect
npmresolve-bin^1.0.1indirect
npmrimraf^4.4.0indirect
npmrimraf^4.4.1indirect
npmrollup^4.18.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-typescript2^0.32.1indirect
npmstylelint^14.16.1indirect
npmstylelint-config-prettier^9.0.5indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard^28.0.0indirect
npmsvgo^2.8.0indirect
npmts-node^10.9.2indirect
npmts-toolbelt^9.6.0indirect
npmtslib^2.6.3indirect
npmtypedoc^0.25.13indirect
npmtypescript^4.9.5indirect
npmunplugin-vue-components^0.22.12indirect
npmvite^4.5.3indirect
npmvite-node^0.34.7indirect
npmvite-plugin-chunk-split^0.5.0indirect
npmvite-plugin-static-copy^0.17.1indirect
npmvitest^2.1.1indirect
npmvue3-marquee^3.2.1indirect
npmyaml-front-matter^4.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@idux/cdk@2.11.0 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.