Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 10:53 UTC

IntelliTect / Multitool

Library of useful additions to your C# application

C#MIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#intellitect#nuget#library#hacktoberfest

IntelliTect/Multitool holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IntelliTectOrganization
43 followers79 public repossince May 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetIntelliTect.Multitool2.1.0-1387 days agointellitectutilitiesmultitooldotnetdotnettoolcsharpaspnetextensions

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume — 63 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year63
human_commit_share0.24
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 87 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~133.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release87
mean_days_between_releases133.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
52.8/80Total downloads — 119,667 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesIntelliTect.Multitool
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads119,667
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 62% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.621

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
39.9/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance — 168/199 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs168
open_issues1
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.95
closed_unmerged_prs31
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

84Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of IntelliTect
25/25Track record — 79 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginIntelliTect
public_repos79
account_age_days5,561
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 87 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesIntelliTect.Multitool
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish87

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.nuget.org/packages/IntelliTect.Multitool
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsintellitect, nuget, library, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/IntelliTect.Multitool
docs_sitehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/IntelliTect.Multitool
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 23 of 24 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.958
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — IntelliTect.Multitool.AotTest/IntelliTect.Multitool.AotTest.csproj, IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj, IntelliTect.Multitool/IntelliTect.Multitool.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 76 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsIntelliTect.Multitool.AotTest/IntelliTect.Multitool.AotTest.csproj, IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj, IntelliTect.Multitool/IntelliTect.Multitool.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.76

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes4,339
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
6contributors
63commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
1open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 10:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Build—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locator—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests/IntelliTect.Multitool.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers—IntelliTect.Multitool/IntelliTect.Multitool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub—IntelliTect.Multitool/IntelliTect.Multitool.csproj
All dependencies 7

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.Build—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locator—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMoq—direct
NuGetxunit—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with IntelliTect/Multitool. Read them side by side →

100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional97jellyfin/jellyfinThe Free Software Media System - Server Backend & APIExceptional98microsoft/kiotaOpenAPI based HTTP Client code generatorExceptional100dotnet/aspnetcoreASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.Exceptional98microsoft/aspireAspire is the tool for code-first, extensible, observable dev and deploy.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.