Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 17:21 UTC

JaCraig / FileCurator

FileCurator simplifies access and management of files from various locations. It could be something on your system, a url, a resource in your app, or any other 3rd party you wish to tie in (Dropbox, etc). There are also a number of file parsers built in.

C#Apache-2.0★ 16 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

JaCraig/FileCurator holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (56/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

James CraigPersonal account
85 followers44 public repossince Jul 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetFileCurator5.2.16-25768 days agofilesystemfileurl

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume250 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year250
human_commit_share0.5
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 68 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~4.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.2.16
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release68
mean_days_between_releases4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars16 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars16
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
57.5/80Total downloads344,418 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesFileCurator
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads344,418
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance479/479 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs479
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach85 followers of JaCraig
24/25Track record44 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers85
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginJaCraig
public_repos44
account_age_days5,487
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 68 days ago
20/20Version history257 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesFileCurator
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish68

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://jacraig.github.io/FileCurator/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfileinfo, embedded-resources, directoryinfo, file-parsing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://jacraig.github.io/FileCurator/
docs_sitehttps://jacraig.github.io/FileCurator/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
1.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 13 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history50 of 50 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,287
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapFileCurator.Example/FileCurator.Example.csproj, FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj, FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance40 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsFileCurator.Example/FileCurator.Example.csproj, FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj, FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.4
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes2/171 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes97,085
source_files_sampled171
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

16GitHub stars
1contributors
250commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'FileCurator.Tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312021-072022-112024-02

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 17:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
3Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMecha.xUnit3.3.22FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild10.0.1FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3FileCurator.Tests/FileCurator.Tests.csproj
NuGetBigBook6.2.16FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml3.5.1FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack1.12.4FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetMimeKit4.17.0FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetPdfPig0.1.15FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers10.0.302FileCurator/FileCurator.csproj
All dependencies 13

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBigBook6.2.16direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild10.0.1direct
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml3.5.1direct
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack1.12.4direct
NuGetMecha.xUnit3.3.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers10.0.302direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301direct
NuGetMimeKit4.17.0direct
NuGetPdfPig0.1.15direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 13 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.