Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 19:22 UTC

Janusec / janusec

JANUSEC Application Gateway provides secure access, including reverse proxy, K8S Ingress Controller, Automatic ACME Certificate, WAF, 5-Second Shield, CC Defense, OAuth2 Authentication, Global Server Load Balance, and Cookie Compliance etc. JANUSEC应用网关,提供安全的接入,包括反向代理、K8S Ingress Controller、自动化ACME证书、WAF、5秒盾、CC防御、OAuth2身份认证、GSLB负载均衡与Cookie合规等。

GoCustom license★ 1,201 stars⑂ 268 forkssince Jul 2018View on GitHub ↗

Janusec/janusec holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (66/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 57 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JANUSECOrganization · verified domain
12 followers4 public repossince Nov 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 57 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume3 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push57
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 57 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~122.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv1.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release57
mean_days_between_releases122.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.9/60Stars1,201 stars
20.2/25Forks268 forks
8.7/15Watchers38 watchers
Inputs used
forks268
stars1,201
watchers38
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicestravis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.594
How it's scored
29.9/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
15/30PR acceptance3/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues15
closed_issues37
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.712
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
8/25Owner reach12 followers of Janusec
17.1/25Track record4 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginJanusec
public_repos4
account_age_days3,235

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://janusec.github.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswaf, web-application-firewall, application-gateway, load-balance, gateway, application-security, golang, security, web-application-security, sql-injection, janusec-application-gateway, web-ssh, janusec, port-forwarding, acme, k8s-ingress-controller, cookie-banner, gslb, cookie-compliance
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://janusec.github.io/
docs_sitehttps://janusec.github.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.49.0 (critical 10.0), golang.org/x/net v0.52.0 (moderate 6.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
28.3/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 129 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories43
affected_packages5
assessed_packages44
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 44 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.1/40Legible commit history2 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.02
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes2/106 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,695,309
source_files_sampled106
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

1,201GitHub stars
3contributors
3commits, last 12 months
57days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
15open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 268 ⇿
0Stars
268Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

050100150200250300267172018-072022-072026-07
Major 1Minor 5Patch 14

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 19:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/bwmarrin/snowflakev0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dchest/captchav1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/glebarez/go-sqlitev1.22.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.13go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/nftablesv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/sessionsv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.72go.mod
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutilv3.21.11+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686ego.mod
Gogithub.com/yookoala/gofastv0.8.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.49.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.52.0go.mod
All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/bwmarrin/snowflakev0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/dchest/captchav1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/glebarez/go-sqlitev1.22.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.13direct
Gogithub.com/google/nftablesv0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/sessionsv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.72direct
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutilv3.21.11+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686edirect
Gogithub.com/yookoala/gofastv0.8.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.49.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.52.0direct
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ntlmsspv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-berv1.5.8-0.20250403174932-29230038a667indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/securecookiev1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/nativev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mdlayher/netlinkv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mdlayher/socketv0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260312153236-7ab1446f8b90indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.34.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools/godocv0.1.0-deprecatedindirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.70.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.48.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 44 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.49.0directcritical300.56.0
golang.org/x/netv0.52.0directmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/modv0.34.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.35.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.