Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 14:34 UTC

JesseChavez / activerecord-jdbc-adapter

SQL Server Adapter support on JRuby's ActiveRecord JDBC Adapter

Ruby · JavaBSD-2-Clause★ 6 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Jan 2019forkView on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#activerecord-jdbc-adapter #jruby #rails #activerecord #ruby #ar-jdbc #jdbc #activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter

JesseChavez/activerecord-jdbc-adapter holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (66/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jesse ChavezPersonal account

7 followers133 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbc-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	51.0	-	108	112 days ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter	72.1.0	-	47	1 day ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbch2-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	1.3.25	-	62	2949 days ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbcmssql-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	1.3.25	-	50	2949 days ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	51.0	-	109	112 days ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbchsqldb-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	1.3.25	-	63	2949 days ago
RubyGems	activerecord-jdbcsqlite3-adapterpoints to another repo — not scored	51.0	-	104	112 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
12.5/36	Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18	Commit volume — 82 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	82
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	18

Release discipline

50Moderate

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 36 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 277 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~190.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	36
latest_release_tag	v72.1.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	277
mean_days_between_releases	190.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical

How it's scored

11.3/60	Stars — 6 stars
7.5/25	Forks — 9 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	9
stars	6
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-2-Clause)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	badge.fury.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good

How it's scored

52.9/80	Total downloads — 123,115 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	123,115
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 39% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	100
top_contributor_share	0.391

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate

How it's scored

28/42	Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
17.6/30	PR acceptance — 10/17 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	10
open_issues	2
closed_issues	4
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	2
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	5
issue_closed_ratio	0.667
closed_unmerged_prs	7
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25	Owner reach — 7 followers of JesseChavez
25/25	Track record — 133 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	7
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	JesseChavez
public_repos	133
account_age_days	5,283

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 47 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter
ecosystems	rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

35Weak

How it's scored

0/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter/72.1.0
0/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	activerecord-jdbc-adapter, jruby, rails, activerecord, ruby, ar-jdbc, jdbc, activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/activerecord-jdbc-alt-adapter/72.1.0
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

2.2/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

52Moderate

How it's scored

7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: org.postgresql:postgresql 42.1.4 (critical 10.0)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,689 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	6
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	3
unassessed_packages	33
affected_by_severity	critical 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40	Legible commit history — 28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.28
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — .mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	.mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/489 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	165,608
source_files_sampled	489
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

6GitHub stars

100contributors

82commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

36releases

2bus factor

2open issues

Maven, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable
Could not fetch maven package 'org.jruby.rails:activerecord-jdbc' from its registry
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbc-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbch2-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbcmssql-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbcmysql-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbchsqldb-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
rubygems package 'activerecord-jdbcsqlite3-adapter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jruby/activerecord-jdbc-adapter); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿

0Stars

9Forks

36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 5Minor 18Patch 13

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 14:33 UTC

3	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 22

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	activerecord	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activemodel	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activesupport	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	actionpack	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	actionview	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activerecord	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activerecord	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activemodel	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activesupport	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	actionpack	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	actionview	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activerecord	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rake	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	jdbc-mssql	`~> 12.6`	Gemfile
RubyGems	jdbc-sqlite3	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	builder	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	erubis	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	msgpack	`~> 1.7`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rack	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`—`	Gemfile
Maven	org.jruby:jruby-complete	`${jruby.version}`	pom.xml
Maven	org.postgresql:postgresql	`42.1.4`	pom.xml

All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Maven	org.jruby:jruby-complete	`10.0.0.1`	direct
Maven	org.postgresql:postgresql	`42.1.4`	direct
RubyGems	actionpack	`—`	direct
RubyGems	actionview	`—`	direct
RubyGems	activemodel	`—`	direct
RubyGems	activerecord	`—`	direct
RubyGems	activesupport	`—`	direct
RubyGems	builder	`—`	direct
RubyGems	erubis	`—`	direct
RubyGems	jdbc-mssql	`—`	direct
RubyGems	jdbc-sqlite3	`—`	direct
RubyGems	msgpack	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rack	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rake	`—`	direct
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`—`	direct
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin	`2.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	bcrypt	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	benchmark-ips	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jdbc-h2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jdbc-hsqldb	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jdbc-jtds	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jdbc-mysql	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jdbc-postgres	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-excludes	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-rails	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-rg	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	mocha	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	mysql2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	ostruct	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	pg	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	pry-nav	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	sqlite3	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	test-unit	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	test-unit-context	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	yard	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
org.postgresql:postgresql	`42.1.4`	direct	critical	6	`42.7.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records