Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 21:18 UTC

JetBrains / phpstorm-stubs

PHP runtime & extensions header files for PhpStorm

PHPApache-2.0★ 1,394 stars⑂ 825 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗

JetBrains/phpstorm-stubs holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

JetBrainsOrganization · verified domain
13,544 followers857 public repossince Jun 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubsv2026.22,162,2992176 days agocodeautocompletetypeinferencestubsinspectionphpstormjetbrains

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 6 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume335 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year335
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year45
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases21 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 36 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~146.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv2026.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases146.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51/60Stars1,394 stars
24.3/25Forks825 forks
13.2/15Watchers242 watchers
Inputs used
forks825
stars1,394
watchers242
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads2,162,299 downloads/month across packagist
12.2/20Registry dependents67 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs
dependents67
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads36,585,639
monthly_downloads2,162,299
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 72 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.26
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
26.4/30PR acceptance1,697/1,930 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance4/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs1,697
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d25
prs_decided_30d26
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs233
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach13,544 followers of JetBrains
25/25Track record857 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers13,544
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginJetBrains
public_repos857
account_age_days5,540

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 76 days ago
20/20Version history21 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish76

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://jetbrains.com/phpstorm
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttp://jetbrains.com/phpstorm
docs_sitehttp://jetbrains.com/phpstorm
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 72 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier29
security_posture_before_jurisdiction58
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages70
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 70 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.45
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
52.2/55Manageable file sizes54/1,052 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes773,134
source_files_sampled1,052
oversized_source_files54

Key facts

1,394GitHub stars
100contributors
335commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
21releases
3bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 825 ⇿
0Stars
825Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02004006008001,00080882015-032020-122026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 21:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 72 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 70

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 70 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistergebnis/agent-detector1.2.0indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.18indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage14.3.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer9.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit13.3.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator8.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff9.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment9.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter8.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/file-filter1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/git-state1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state9.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context8.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/version7.0.0indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.1.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.1.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.1.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.2indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 70 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.