Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 13:11 UTC

JiangJie / minigame-std

Cross-platform standard library for WeChat minigame and web browsers with unified APIs for crypto, fs, fetch, storage, and more.

TypeScriptMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗

JiangJie/minigame-std holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (26/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JarvisJiangPersonal account
122 followers27 public repossince Mar 2012@AlloyTeam

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume371 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year371
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases53 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~14.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count53
latest_release_tagv2.6.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases14.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15/25Owner reach122 followers of JiangJie
22.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers122
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginJiangJie
public_repos27
account_age_days5,237
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsminigame, std, base64, clipboard, crypto, md5, network, sha, storage, image, webaudio, browser, filesystem, hmac, performance, random, request, video, websocket, weixin
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,988
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingpackages/minigame-std/tsconfig.json, packages/minigame-test/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/minigame-std/tsconfig.json, packages/minigame-test/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/177 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes49,648
source_files_sampled177
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
371commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
53releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 13:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 264

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 264 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@blazediff/core1.9.1indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.6.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@happy-ts/fetch-t1.10.0indirect
npm@happy-ts/fetch-t^1.10.0indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@jsr/std__assert1.0.19indirect
npm@jsr/std__assert^1.0.19indirect
npm@jsr/std__internal1.0.14indirect
npm@jsr/std__path1.1.6indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin5.10.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node26.1.1indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.63.0indirect
npm@vitest/browser4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/browser-playwright4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/ui4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.4indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.7.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfflate0.8.3indirect
npmfflate^0.8.3indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhappy-codec1.2.2indirect
npmhappy-codec^1.2.2indirect
npmhappy-opfs2.1.0indirect
npmhappy-opfs^2.1.0indirect
npmhappy-rusty1.10.0indirect
npmhappy-rusty^1.10.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.3indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmminigame-api-typings3.8.20indirect
npmminigame-api-typings^3.8.20indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.19indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmrollup4.62.2indirect
npmrollup-plugin-dts6.4.1indirect
npmrsa-oaep-encryption1.2.1indirect
npmrsa-oaep-encryption^1.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtiny-future1.2.0indirect
npmtiny-future^1.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.63.0indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite8.1.4indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.