Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 17:25 UTC

JuznemHub / Athena-Search

More than a Second Brain, less than a Brain.

JavaScriptCustom license★ 5 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

JuznemHub/Athena-Search holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JuznemHubPersonal account
1 follower4 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmathena-tui1.0.364673233 days agoathenaathena-searchbookmarkstelegramclituisecond-brain

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume388 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year388
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
35.6/80Monthly downloads467 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesathena-tui
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads467
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

41Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 83% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.832
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance127/127 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs127
open_issues4
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d47
prs_decided_30d47
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of JuznemHub
10.7/25Track record4 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginJuznemHub
public_repos4
account_age_days1,017
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history32 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesathena-tui
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packagingno data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages109
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:athena-tui@1.0.36 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 109 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,534
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
52.7/55Manageable file sizes2/48 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes804,332
source_files_sampled48
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
2contributors
388commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-082026-082026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 17:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@firecrawl/anydoc^0.1.9package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.30.0package.json
npmpg^8.22.0package.json
npmtelegram^2.26.22package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.30.0tui/package.json
npmpg^8.22.0tui/package.json
All dependencies 223

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 217 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@firecrawl/anydoc0.1.9direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.30.0direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.30.0direct
npmpg8.22.0direct
npmpg^8.22.0direct
npmtelegram2.26.22direct
npm@cryptography/aes0.1.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-darwin-arm640.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-darwin-x640.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-linux-arm64-gnu0.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-linux-arm64-musl0.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-linux-x64-gnu0.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-linux-x64-musl0.1.9indirect
npm@firecrawl/anydoc-win32-x64-msvc0.1.9indirect
npm@hono/node-server2.1.1indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmacorn8.18.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmasync-mutex0.3.2indirect
npmathena-tui1.0.36indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbig-integer1.6.52indirect
npmbody-parser2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmbufferutil4.1.0indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcontent-type2.1.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmd1.0.2indirect
npmdebug2.6.9indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer1.4.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler4.3.1indirect
npmdomutils2.8.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes5-ext0.10.64indirect
npmes6-iterator2.0.3indirect
npmes6-symbol3.1.4indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmesniff2.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmevent-emitter0.3.5indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.1.1indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.6.2indirect
npmext1.7.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.5indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.4indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals17.8.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhono4.13.2indirect
npmhtmlparser26.1.0indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.3indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.5.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.9indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.1indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime3.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmnext-tick1.1.0indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmnode-localstorage2.2.1indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpako2.2.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-browserify1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpg-cloudflare1.4.0indirect
npmpg-connection-string2.14.0indirect
npmpg-int81.0.1indirect
npmpg-pool3.14.0indirect
npmpg-protocol1.15.0indirect
npmpg-types2.2.0indirect
npmpgpass1.0.5indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmpostgres-array2.0.0indirect
npmpostgres-bytea1.0.1indirect
npmpostgres-date1.0.7indirect
npmpostgres-interval1.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqs6.15.3indirect
npmrange-parser1.3.0indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmreal-cancellable-promise1.2.3indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmslide1.1.6indirect
npmsmart-buffer4.2.0indirect
npmsocks2.8.9indirect
npmsplit24.2.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstore22.14.4indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmts-custom-error3.3.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype2.7.3indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-is2.1.0indirect
npmtypedarray-to-buffer3.1.5indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutf-8-validate5.0.10indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwebsocket1.0.35indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic1.3.4indirect
npmxtend4.0.2indirect
npmyaeti0.0.6indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
npmzod4.4.3indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:athena-tui@1.0.36 pulls in 109 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.