Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 04:18 UTC

Keeper-Security / keeper-sdk-dotnet

.Net and PowerShell version of Keeper Commander, a CLI and SDK interface for the Keeper Security platform.

C# · PowerShellMIT★ 36 stars⑂ 29 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined

Keeper-Security/keeper-sdk-dotnet holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Keeper SecurityOrganization · verified domain
161 followers65 public repossince May 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetKeeper.Cli1.0.7-4202 days ago—
NuGetKeeper.Sdk1.1.13-270 days agokeeperpasswordmanager
NuGetKeeper.Biometrics1.0.0-1209 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 150 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year150
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 68 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~22.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count68
latest_release_tagv1.1.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases22.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25/60Stars — 36 stars
12.1/25Forks — 29 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks29
stars36
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.9/80Total downloads — 192,237 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesKeeper.Cli, Keeper.Sdk, Keeper.Biometrics
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads192,237
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.663
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 479/519 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs479
open_issues2
closed_issues55
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d10
prs_merged_30d29
prs_decided_30d29
issue_closed_ratio0.965
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.9/25Owner reach — 161 followers of Keeper-Security
25/25Track record — 65 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers161
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginKeeper-Security
public_repos65
account_age_days4,875

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesKeeper.Cli, Keeper.Sdk, Keeper.Biometrics
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.keeper.io/secrets-manager/commander-cli/using-commander/dotnet-powershell
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspassword-manager, powershell, commander, dotnet, passwords, security
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.keeper.io/secrets-manager/commander-cli/using-commander/dotnet-powershell
docs_sitehttps://docs.keeper.io/secrets-manager/commander-cli/using-commander/dotnet-powershell
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.9

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages1
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 17 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.keeper.io/llms.txt)
22.4/40Legible commit history — 42 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.keeper.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.42
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cli/Cli.csproj, Commander/Commander.csproj, KeeperBiometrics/KeeperBiometrics.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCli/Cli.csproj, Commander/Commander.csproj, KeeperBiometrics/KeeperBiometrics.csproj, KeeperSdk/KeeperSdk.csproj, Sample/Sample.csproj, Tests/Tests.csproj, WPFSample/WPFSample.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
50.2/55Manageable file sizes — 36/409 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes1,922,784
source_files_sampled409
oversized_source_files36
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

36GitHub stars
11contributors
150commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
68releases
1bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 29 ⇿
0Stars
29Forks
65Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302922021-012023-102026-08
Major 1Minor 1Patch 15

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 04:17 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5CI-Tests2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1Cli/Cli.csproj
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1Commander/Commander.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite9.0.2Commander/Commander.csproj
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager9.0.2Commander/Commander.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.ProtectedData9.0.2Commander/Commander.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4Commander/Commander.csproj
NuGetPeterO.Cbor4.5.5KeeperBiometrics/KeeperBiometrics.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3KeeperBiometrics/KeeperBiometrics.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.28.3KeeperBiometrics/KeeperBiometrics.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.28.3KeeperSdk/KeeperSdk.csproj
NuGetPortable.BouncyCastle1.9.0KeeperSdk/KeeperSdk.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 6 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1direct
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.28.3direct
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.8.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite9.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite9.0.2direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetPeterO.Cbor4.5.5direct
NuGetPortable.BouncyCastle1.9.0direct
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager9.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.ProtectedData9.0.2direct
NuGetBouncyCastle1.8.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.11.1indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common8.0.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.2indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 17 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
BouncyCastle1.8.5indirectmoderate42.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.