Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 12:12 UTC

Kreoh / kroog

Koog is a JVM (Java and Kotlin) framework for building predictable, fault-tolerant and enterprise-ready AI agents across all platforms – from backend services to Android and iOS, JVM, and even in-browser environments. Koog is based on our AI products expertise and provides proven solutions for complex LLM and AI problems

KotlinApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026forkView on GitHub ↗

Kreoh/kroog holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KreohOrganization · verified domain
1 follower4 public repossince Aug 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 14 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume905 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year905
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year50
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases8 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tag1.1.1-kroog.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases1.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.135
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of Kreoh
15.1/25Track record4 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginKreoh
public_repos4
account_age_days1,826

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

57Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows23 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.koog.ai
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.koog.ai
docs_sitehttps://docs.koog.ai
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, a2a/CLAUDE.md, examples/simple-examples/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.koog.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.koog.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, a2a/CLAUDE.md, examples/simple-examples/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,564
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapa2a/a2a-client/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-core/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-server/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingexamples/koog-js-example/webApp/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsexamples/koog-js-example/webApp/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsa2a/a2a-client/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-core/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-server/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-test/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-transport/a2a-transport-client-jsonrpc-http/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-transport/a2a-transport-core-jsonrpc/build.gradle.kts, a2a/a2a-transport/a2a-transport-server-jsonrpc-http/build.gradle.kts, a2a/test-tck/a2a-test-server-tck/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-cli/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-core/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-ext/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-a2a-client/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-a2a-core/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-a2a-server/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-acp/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-chat-history-aws/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-chat-history-jdbc/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-chat-memory-sql/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-event-handler/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-longterm-memory-aws/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-longterm-memory/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-memory/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-opentelemetry/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-persistence-jdbc/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-snapshot/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-sql/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-tokenizer/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-features/agents-features-trace/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-mcp-metadata/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-mcp-server/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-mcp/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-planner/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-test/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-tools/build.gradle.kts, agents/agents-utils/build.gradle.kts, build.gradle.kts, convention-plugin-ai/build.gradle.kts, docs/build.gradle.kts, embeddings/embeddings-base/build.gradle.kts, embeddings/embeddings-llm/build.gradle.kts, examples/acp-agent/build.gradle.kts, examples/code-agent/step-01-minimal-agent/build.gradle.kts, examples/code-agent/step-02-add-execution-tool/build.gradle.kts, examples/code-agent/step-03-add-observability/build.gradle.kts, examples/code-agent/step-04-add-subagent/build.gradle.kts, examples/code-agent/step-05-history/build.gradle.kts, examples/demo-compose-app/androidApp/build.gradle.kts, examples/demo-compose-app/build.gradle.kts, examples/demo-compose-app/commonApp/build.gradle.kts, examples/demo-compose-app/desktopApp/build.gradle.kts, examples/demo-compose-app/webApp/build.gradle.kts, examples/devoxx-belgium-2025/build.gradle.kts, examples/javaone-2026/build.gradle.kts, examples/koog-agentcore-runtime/build.gradle.kts, examples/koog-java-api-example/build.gradle.kts, examples/koog-js-example/build.gradle.kts, examples/koog-js-example/koogelis/build.gradle.kts, examples/simple-examples-java/build.gradle.kts, examples/simple-examples-java/buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, examples/simple-examples/build.gradle.kts, examples/simple-examples/buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, examples/spring-ai-java/pom.xml, examples/spring-ai-kotlin/build.gradle.kts, examples/spring-boot-java/pom.xml, examples/spring-boot-kotlin/build.gradle.kts, examples/spring-io-2026/java/pom.xml, examples/spring-io-2026/kotlin/build.gradle.kts, examples/trip-planning-example/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-core/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-java/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-ktor/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-spring-webclient/build.gradle.kts, http-client/http-client-test/build.gradle.kts, integration-tests/build.gradle.kts, koog-agents-additions/build.gradle.kts, koog-agents/build.gradle.kts, koog-bedrock-agentcore-runtime/build.gradle.kts, koog-ktor/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/koog-spring-ai-v2-common/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/koog-spring-ai-v2-starter-chat-memory/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/koog-spring-ai-v2-starter-model-chat/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/koog-spring-ai-v2-starter-model-embedding/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai-v2/koog-spring-ai-v2-starter-vector-store/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/koog-spring-ai-common/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/koog-spring-ai-starter-chat-memory/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/koog-spring-ai-starter-model-chat/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/koog-spring-ai-starter-model-embedding/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-ai/koog-spring-ai-starter-vector-store/build.gradle.kts, koog-spring-boot-starter/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-cache/prompt-cache-files/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-cache/prompt-cache-model/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-cache/prompt-cache-redis/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-cached/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-anthropic-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-bedrock-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-dashscope-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-deepseek-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-google-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-litert-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-mistralai-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-ollama-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-openai-client-base/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-openai-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-clients/prompt-executor-openrouter-client/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-llms-all/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-managed-execution/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-executor/prompt-executor-model/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-llm/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-markdown/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-model/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-processor/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-structure/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-tokenizer/build.gradle.kts, prompt/prompt-xml/build.gradle.kts, rag/rag-base/build.gradle.kts, rag/rag-vector/build.gradle.kts, serialization/serialization-core/build.gradle.kts, serialization/serialization-jackson/build.gradle.kts, serialization/serialization-test/build.gradle.kts, skills-api-consumer-test/build.gradle.kts, skills/build.gradle.kts, test-utils/build.gradle.kts, utils/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeKotlin (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes7/1,905 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageKotlin
largest_source_bytes103,789
source_files_sampled1,905
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
98contributors
905commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
8releases
6bus factor
0open issues
Maven, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'test-python-a2a-server' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 12:12 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIa2a-sdk==0.3.22a2a/test-python-a2a-server/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn==0.35.0a2a/test-python-a2a-server/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.