Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 14:30 UTC

Kryft-Studios / cosmos-js

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Kryft-Studios/cosmos-js holds a health index of 18 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Security (38/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (5/100). It was last updated 56 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

18
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

18
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 24 is calibrated to 18 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Kryft StudiosOrganization
2 followers26 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@cosmos-js/core0.1.15951556 days agowebgpuabstractiongraphicsapilowlevel
npm@cosmos-js/common0.1.766856 days ago—
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-structpoints to another repo — not scored0.2.539761 days agowebgpustructgpucpu
npmcosmotic⚠ Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.0.1.222359 days agowebgpuabstractiongraphicsapilowlevel
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-gcabpoints to another repo — not scored1.0.231376 days agowebgpugraphicsarraybuffergpuarray
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-id-array0.1.327376 days agowebgpuarraycpugpuhelper
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-slot-array0.1.753876 days agowebgpuarraycpugpuhelper
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-texture-registry0.1.132276 days agotextureregistrygraphicswgpuwebgpu

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

33At Risk
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 56 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume — 18 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push56
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

42Weak
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

36Weak
How it's scored
29/80Monthly downloads — 149 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@cosmos-js/core, cosmotic, @cosmos-js/wgpu-texture-registry
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads149
unverified_packages_excluded@cosmos-js/common, @cosmos-js/wgpu-id-array, @cosmos-js/wgpu-slot-array
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

31At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

45Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of Kryft-Studios
11.6/25Track record — 26 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginKryft-Studios
public_repos26
account_age_days223

Package maintenance

80Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
0/20Not deprecated — cosmotic: Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.
Inputs used
packages@cosmos-js/core, @cosmos-js/common, cosmotic, @cosmos-js/wgpu-id-array, @cosmos-js/wgpu-slot-array, @cosmos-js/wgpu-texture-registry
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedyes
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

5Critical · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

23At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@cosmos-js/core@0.1.15 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — common/tsconfig.json, core/tsconfig.json, cosmotic/tsconfig.json, struct/tsconfig.json, wgpu-gcab/tsconfig.json, wgpu-id-array/tsconfig.json, wgpu-slot-array/tsconfig.json, wgpu-texture-registry/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configscommon/tsconfig.json, core/tsconfig.json, cosmotic/tsconfig.json, struct/tsconfig.json, wgpu-gcab/tsconfig.json, wgpu-id-array/tsconfig.json, wgpu-slot-array/tsconfig.json, wgpu-texture-registry/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes26,544
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
18commits, last 12 months
56days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package '@cosmos-js/wgpu-struct' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Kryft-Studios); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@cosmos-js/wgpu-gcab' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Kryft-Studios); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 14:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@cosmos-js/common^0.1.7core/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-texture-registry^0.1.1core/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/core^0.1.6cosmotic/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-id-array^0.1.3cosmotic/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-struct^0.2.5cosmotic/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-texture-registry^0.1.1cosmotic/package.json
npmwgpu-matrix^3.4.2cosmotic/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-gcablatestwgpu-id-array/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-structlatestwgpu-id-array/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-gcab^1.0.0wgpu-slot-array/package.json
npm@cosmos-js/wgpu-struct^0.2.3wgpu-slot-array/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@cosmos-js/core@0.1.15 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Kryft-Studios/cosmos-js. Read them side by side →

98gfx-rs/wgpuA cross-platform, safe, pure-Rust graphics API.Exceptional94tracel-ai/burnBurn is a next generation tensor library and Deep Learning Framework that doesn't compromise on flexibility, efficiency and portability.Exceptional94safe-global/safe-core-sdkThe Safe{Core} SDK allows builders to add account abstraction functionality into their apps.Exceptional94emilk/eguiegui: an easy-to-use immediate mode GUI in Rust that runs on both web and nativeExceptional100fastify/fastifyFast and low overhead web framework, for Node.jsExceptional99scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.