Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:34 UTC

LedgerHQ / ledger-device-rust-sdk

Rust SDK for Ledger device applications

RustApache-2.0★ 64 stars⑂ 40 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

LedgerHQ/ledger-device-rust-sdk holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (71/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LedgerOrganization
1,192 followers593 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.iotestmacro0.1.03471971 days ago
crates.ioinclude_gif1.3.212,4481433 days ago
crates.ioledger_device_sdk1.36.011,78111833 days ago
crates.ioledger_secure_sdk_sys1.16.311,745541 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 443 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year443
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29.2/60Stars — 64 stars
13.3/25Forks — 40 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks40
stars64
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.8/80Monthly downloads — 36,321 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestestmacro, include_gif, ledger_device_sdk, ledger_secure_sdk_sys
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads780,306
monthly_downloads36,321
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled35
top_contributor_share0.674
How it's scored
39.3/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
25.8/30PR acceptance — 319/371 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs319
open_issues3
closed_issues44
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.936
closed_unmerged_prs52
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22.1/25Owner reach — 1,192 followers of LedgerHQ
25/25Track record — 593 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,192
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginLedgerHQ
public_repos593
account_age_days4,279

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 118 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestestmacro, include_gif, ledger_device_sdk, ledger_secure_sdk_sys
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:testmacro@0.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 4 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/rust.instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.1/40Legible commit history — 32 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.32
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/rust.instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,776
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, include_gif/Cargo.toml, ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, include_gif/Cargo.toml, ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml, ledger_secure_sdk_sys/Cargo.toml, testmacro/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/94 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes36,239
source_files_sampled94
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

64GitHub stars
35contributors
443commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
3open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 40 ⇿
0Stars
40Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383722021-022023-102026-06

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iosyn1.0include_gif/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0.28include_gif/Cargo.toml
crates.iopng0.18include_gif/Cargo.toml
crates.iogif0.14include_gif/Cargo.toml
crates.ioinclude_gif1.3.2ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2.14ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_core0.6.3ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1.6.0ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.ionumtoa0.2.4ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconst-zero0.1.1ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.ioledger_secure_sdk_sys1.16.2ledger_device_sdk/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembedded-alloc0.5.1ledger_secure_sdk_sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section1.2.0ledger_secure_sdk_sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn1.0testmacro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0testmacro/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 45 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioconst-zerodirect
crates.ioconst-zero0.1.1direct
crates.iocritical-sectiondirect
crates.iocritical-section1.2.0direct
crates.ioembedded-allocdirect
crates.ioembedded-alloc0.5.1direct
crates.ioflate2direct
crates.ioflate21.1.9direct
crates.iogifdirect
crates.iogif0.14.1direct
crates.ioinclude_gifdirect
crates.ioledger_secure_sdk_sysdirect
crates.ionum-traitsdirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19direct
crates.ionumtoadirect
crates.ionumtoa0.2.4direct
crates.iopngdirect
crates.iopng0.18.1direct
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45direct
crates.iorand_coredirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4direct
crates.iosyndirect
crates.iosyn1.0.109direct
crates.iosyn2.0.117direct
crates.iozeroizedirect
crates.iozeroize1.8.2direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobindgenindirect
crates.iobindgen0.72.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.0indirect
crates.ioccindirect
crates.iocc1.2.56indirect
crates.iocexpr0.6.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclang-sys1.8.1indirect
crates.iocolor_quant1.1.0indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.iofdeflate0.3.7indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.ioglobindirect
crates.ioglob0.3.3indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.183indirect
crates.iolibloading0.8.9indirect
crates.iolinked_list_allocator0.10.5indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.0indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionom7.1.3indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.3indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.10indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.1indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.8indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioweezl0.1.12indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:testmacro@0.1.0 pulls in 4 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.