Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 20:20 UTC

Loongphy / codext

An opinionated Codex CLI with better DX

RustApache-2.0★ 142 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Jan 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#codex#codex-windows

Loongphy/codext holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LoongphyPersonal account
56 followers43 public repossince Aug 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@loongphy/codext0.153.4-50990b99,1983110 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 9,046 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year9,046
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 62 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagcodext-v0.153.4-50990b9
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases3.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak
How it's scored
34.9/60Stars — 142 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars142
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
52.8/80Monthly downloads — 9,198 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@loongphy/codext
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,198
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

91Excellent
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 17% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.172

Issue & PR responsiveness

56Moderate
How it's scored
25.8/42Issue resolution — 62% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance — 3/4 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues5
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.615
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach — 56 followers of Loongphy
24/25Track record — 43 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginLoongphy
public_repos43
account_age_days2,954
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 311 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@loongphy/codext
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — clippy.toml, codex-rs/Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), eslint.config.js, ruff.toml, rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

35Weak
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscodex, codex-windows
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

53Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 98 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, codex-rs/tui/src/bottom_pane/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, codex-rs/tui/src/bottom_pane/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,388

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — clippy.toml, codex-rs/Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), eslint.config.js, ruff.toml, rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — sdk/python/src/openai_codex/py.typed, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssdk/python/src/openai_codex/py.typed, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscodex-rs/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/agent-graph-store/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/agent-identity/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/agent-roles/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/analytics/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ansi-escape/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-daemon/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-protocol-noop-macros/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-protocol/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-test-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server-transport/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/apply-patch/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/arg0/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/async-utils/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/aws-auth/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/backend-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/build-info/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/bwrap/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/chatgpt/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/cli/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/cloud-config/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/cloud-tasks-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/cloud-tasks-mock-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/cloud-tasks/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/code-mode-host/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/code-mode-protocol/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/code-mode-runtime/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/code-mode/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-api/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-backend-openapi-models/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-experimental-api-macros/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-home/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/codex-mcp/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/collaboration-mode-templates/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/config-schema/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/config/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/connectors/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/context-fragments/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/core-api/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/core-plugins/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/core/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/core/tests/common/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/diagnostics/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/exec-server-protocol/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/exec-server/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/exec-server/tests/support/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/exec/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/execpolicy/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/agent/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/connectors/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/extension-api/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/git-attribution/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/goal/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/guardian-v2/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/history-notes/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/image-generation/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/items/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/mcp/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/memories/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/queue/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/skills/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ext/web-search/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/external-agent-migration/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/features/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/feedback/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/file-search/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/file-system/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/file-watcher/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/git-utils/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/guardian-context/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/history/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/hooks/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/http-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/install-context/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/keyring-store/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/linux-sandbox/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/lmstudio/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/login/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/mcp-server/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/common/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/memories/read/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/memories/write/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/message-history/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/model-provider-info/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/model-provider/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/models-manager/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/network-proxy/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/ollama/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/otel-trace-websocket/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/otel/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/plugin/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/process-hardening/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/prompts/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/protocol/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/realtime-webrtc/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/response-debug-context/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/responses-api-proxy/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/rmcp-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/rollout-trace/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/rollout/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/sandboxing/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/secrets/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/shell-command/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/shell-escalation/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/skills/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/state/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/stdio-to-uds/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/terminal-detection/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/test-binary-support/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/thread-manager-sample/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/thread-store/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/tools/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/tui/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/uds/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/absolute-path/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/approval-presets/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/audio/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/cache/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/cargo-bin/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/cli/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/elapsed/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/fuzzy-match/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/git-discovery/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/home-dir/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/image/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/oss/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/output-truncation/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/path-uri/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/path-utils/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/plugins/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/pty/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/readiness/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/redacted-string/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/rustls-provider/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/sandbox-summary/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/sleep-inhibitor/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/stream-parser/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/string/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/utils/template/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/v8-poc/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/voice-host/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/websocket-client/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/windows-sandbox-rs/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/workload-identity/Cargo.toml, codex-rs/worktree/Cargo.toml, tools/argument-comment-lint/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 169/4,457 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes509,149
source_files_sampled4,457
oversized_source_files169

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — codex-rs/code-mode-protocol/src/grpc/codex.code_mode.v1.proto, codex-rs/config/src/thread_config/proto/codex.thread_config.v1.proto, codex-rs/exec-server/src/proto/codex.exec_server.relay.v1.proto
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples, notebooks, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples, notebooks, samples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filescodex-rs/code-mode-protocol/src/grpc/codex.code_mode.v1.proto, codex-rs/config/src/thread_config/proto/codex.thread_config.v1.proto, codex-rs/exec-server/src/proto/codex.exec_server.relay.v1.proto
interfaces_expected_of—

Key facts

142GitHub stars
98contributors
9,046commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
62releases
6bus factor
5open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'codex-scripts' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@loongphy/codext@0.153.4-50990b9; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151442026-032026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 20:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities98 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIruff>=0.15.8scripts/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Loongphy/codext. Read them side by side →

98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional93NVIDIA/NeMo-RelayMulti-language agent runtime and library for execution scope management, lifecycle events, and middleware on tool and LLM calls.Exceptional93hashgraph-online/hol-guardOpen-source antivirus for AI agents: block risky tools, secret access, prompt injection, malicious packages, MCP servers, plugins, and skills at runtime.Exceptional93affaan-m/ECCThe agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.Exceptional80juyterman1000/entrolyAuditable context engineering for AI agents: context optimization, recoverable context compression, receipts, answer verification, and MCP for Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw.Excellent78Mai0313/VibeCodingTrackerTrack AI coding costs in real-time — a lightweight Rust CLI/TUI for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot & Gemini usage and cost analyticsGood

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.